AI Rate Professor

Automotive Technology

Manuel Patron

AT105 · AUTO105 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
23/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

unless you can teach yourself from the textbook and outside sources.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesTextbook HeavyPoor ExplanationsHard ClassExtra Credit
  • Students describe the class as very hard and heavily dependent on textbook work or outside learning.
  • Both reviews .
  • may help, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Passing is possible with effort and , but students describe the class as very hard and self-directed.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The content feels hard mainly because and students must rely on textbook and outside information.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do .

No online evidence exists, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

because and the class requires too much self-teaching.

, and there are no online reviews to offset them.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

helped one student, but the only reported grade is a C- and the class is described as very hard.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students mention long lectures, textbook-heavy work, worksheets, and outside research.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Students say he is knowledgeable but .

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Comments emphasize textbook work and worksheets more than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person students say he knows the subject but worksheets, and leaves students to learn much of the material themselves.

Main concern

The .

What students said

“His lectures are really long and most of the work is in the textbook.”
AT105
“ .”
AUTO105

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention worksheets and textbook work but .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It was a very hard class but you can definitely pass if you do the work and look outside of class for info.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching clarity, workload, and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Mr. Patron, is a horrible teacher.”

📚 Workload Burden

25/100

“His lectures are really long and most of the work is in the textbook.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

15/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Mr. Patron is very knowledgeable on this subject but he just doesn't do a great job of rebounding the information.
  • Hes lectures most of the time dont make sense when trying to compare about what he is teaching.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It was a very hard class but you can definitely pass if you do the work and look outside of class for info.
  • He did offer which really helped my grade.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

, but both are detailed and consistently negative.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

AT1051 review
AUTO1051 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values