AI Rate Professor

Counseling

Renee Ssensalo

COUN150 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you will attend, participate, and keep up with .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring professorFunny classParticipation mattersOnline homeworkReading-based tests
  • Students generally describe her as caring, funny, and pleasant.
  • Participation and , and skipping class is a .
  • , and one student found the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Grades look reachable with , and , but it is not a free A.

The online review suggests an easy positive experience, while and staying current with work.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Students say the class is not very difficult, though readings, tests, participation, and .

, while the single online review is too short to judge content difficulty deeply.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Multiple tags and comments indicate participation and .

Both online and in-person evidence point toward attendance mattering, but .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Students mostly recommend her because , and manageable if students participate and do the work.

Online feedback is positive but minimal, while about online homework.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

65/100

Reviews do not show harsh grading, but , and .

Format shift

; the online review does not describe grading.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Homework, , and participation create a moderate workload.

Format shift

, while the online review gives no workload detail.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students usually describe her as nice, caring, funny, and effective, with .

Format shift

Both formats are positive, but .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears to mix online homework, group presentations, participation, and reading-based tests.

Format shift

, and tests; online evidence is too brief.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

with participation, online homework, group presentations, and reading-based tests.

Main concern

Students who fall behind on online work or dislike participation may struggle.

What students said

“Pretty nice and funny professor.”
COUN150
“Very nice and caring. Super funny.”
COUN150

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The only online review is very positive but too brief to prove much beyond a good experience.

Main concern

The online evidence is thin and only clearly shows that skipping class is risky.

What students said

“Great Professor”
COUN150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention reading-based tests and online homework but do not .

Reading-Based TestsOnline HomeworkParticipation

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, midterm, or .

Reading-Based Tests
“ but they arent too hard.”
COUN150

Online

The online review does not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very nice and caring. Super funny.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, participation, workload, and tests. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Very nice and caring. Super funny.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

78/100

“Pretty nice and funny professor.”

📌

28/100

“Participation matters.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great Professor
  • Pretty nice and funny professor.
  • Very nice and caring. Super funny.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • and everyone in the class is assigned into groups that must present a chapter.
  • and so if you aren't good with staying on top of online work this isn't the course for you.

Theme 3

🧪 About Tests

  • but they arent too hard.
  • Participation matters.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because only 4 reviews are available, but they are fairly consistent and include some concrete course details.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COUN1504 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2