AI Rate Professor

Art

Holly Boruck

ART123 · ART123C · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you can work independently and tolerate harsh critique with minimal instructional support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-study feelingHarsh criticismPoor supportPublic yellingLong critiques
  • Both reviews describe a negative learning experience with little useful support.
  • The and long critique sessions become mentally draining.
  • The online review reports hostile behavior, public yelling, and constant complaints about student artwork.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

There is little grade evidence, but difficulty ratings are high and comments imply success requires self-direction under harsh or limited support.

Online evidence points to harsh critique, while and limited help.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course feels challenging because students describe being left on their own and receiving .

Online evidence emphasizes critique stress, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students do not recommend her because they , and a draining class experience.

Both online and in-person reviews are negative, though each format has only one review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

, but the online review says she consistently complains about artwork, suggesting harsh critique standards.

Format shift

Online evidence suggests harsh critique, while .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Workload is not fully described, but the class feels heavy because students report and long critique sessions.

Format shift

In-person evidence mentions long input sharing, while online evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Teaching quality is very poor in the comments because students describe limited help, hostile responses, and public yelling.

Format shift

Online evidence is harsher about behavior, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment evidence is limited, but comments center on artwork and .

Format shift

Both formats discuss artwork or critique, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The with too much time spent on group input sharing.

Main concern

The main concern is limited guidance and mentally draining critique time.

What students said

“Hollys class feels more like self study with how often you feel like youre on your own more than her helping you.”
ART123C
“3 hours of input sharing with every single student is too much”
ART123C

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review describes a hostile class environment with attitude, public yelling, and discouraging critique.

Main concern

The main concern is harsh treatment of students who ask questions or make mistakes.

What students said

“ !”
ART123
“She yells at students for simple mistakes, IN FRONT OF EVERYONE, doesnt even apologize if shes yelling at the wrong student.”
ART123

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, proctoring rule, .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , final, open-book, or closed-book exam policy.

Online

The online review does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, quiz, midterm, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Hollys class feels more like self study with how often you feel like youre on your own more than her helping you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in support, critique style, and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“Hollys class feels more like self study with how often you feel like youre on your own more than her helping you.”

⚠️ Student Treatment

5/100

“She yells at students for simple mistakes, IN FRONT OF EVERYONE, doesnt even apologize if shes yelling at the wrong student.”

📉 Recommendation Risk

5/100

“DO NOT HAVE HER.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Support

  • Hollys class feels more like self study with how often you feel like youre on your own more than her helping you.
  • 3 hours of input sharing with every single student is too much

Theme 2

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • !
  • Gives so much attitude to her students that ask a simple question.
  • She will always find a way to complain about your artwork.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews exist, one online and one in person, so the negative pattern is concerning but based on limited evidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ART1231 review
ART123C1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1