AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Raymond White

MATH141 · MATHMATH · MATH40 · MATH040C · MATH20 · MATH120 · MATH020 · MAT015 · MAT141 · MTH40 · MATH040 · MATH140 · 39 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
15.38%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless you are very self-directed in math and , and test-heavy assessment.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy homeworkTough gradingConfusing lecturesTest heavyRude or dismissive
  • , and exams that do not match lessons.
  • A few students say he cares and offers drops, curves, or , but these are outnumbered by strong negative experiences.
  • Attendance and doing work help, but many students still report poor teaching clarity and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Getting an A appears difficult because students report , and exams that often feel unlike the practice work.

The online evidence is one very negative review, while the and harsh grading pattern.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The math content becomes harder because lectures are often described as , and poorly aligned with assignments and exams.

Both formats point to difficulty, but the courses.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

because several students say skipping class means you will not pass or will fall behind.

The online review does not clearly address attendance, while as necessary.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

16/100

Most students do not recommend him because , and dismissive responses to questions.

The one , and the much larger in-person set is also strongly negative overall.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students frequently say he deducts points for not using his exact method even when answers are correct.

Format shift

The online review calls him a tough grader, and and .

Workload

Overwhelming

8/100

, with many reviews calling it excessive or insane.

Format shift

Both online and in-person reviews describe heavy homework, with .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most comments describe , poor explanations, rushing, mistakes, and rude or dismissive behavior.

Format shift

The online review is very negative, and the .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Grades appear heavily driven by tests, quizzes, and a but not reliably protecting grades.

Format shift

The online review does not clarify assessment structure, while , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

38 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews consistently report lots of , and exams that feel disconnected from class work.

Main concern

Students often feel punished for not solving problems exactly his way.

What students said

“ .”
MATH040
“ not what he teaches in class.”
MATH141
“Stay on top of your hw and you'll do fine.”
MATH020

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is , and harsh grading.

Main concern

Heavy workload and dismissive instruction make the online experience high risk.

What students said

“He gives an extreme amount of homework.”
MATH040
“ . .”
MATH040

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe a strict test-heavy structure with difficult exams, surprise problems, and deductions for not using his exact method.

Test HeavyTrick QuestionsFinal ExamStrict Method Grading

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, trick questions, and strict grading, but do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring rules.

Five Exams And FinalTrick QuestionsWeekly QuizzesStrict Method Grading
“the tests (which are 5 exams and 1 final), they are extremely difficult”
MATH040
“ not what he teaches in class.”
MATH141
“Theres a but .”
MATH020

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, webcam use, or Lockdown Browser use.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 39 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in , and recommendation tone; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“He does not teach.”

⚖️

12/100

“he will mark because its not his way”

📚 Workload

8/100

“The amount of HW given in this class is insane.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are all over the place.
  • White does not know how to teach.
  • Very thorough, and helps students that don't understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • not what he teaches in class.
  • If you forget to put parenthesis or miss some sign on your work even if the answer is .
  • easy to get an a if you put in the time

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • He gives WAY TOO MUCH hw and usually gives them last minute.
  • but some written as well...
  • Stay on top of your hw and you'll do fine.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

39

Recent reviews read by the AI

39

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 39 reviews span many years and show a consistent pattern, despite a small minority of positive comments.

Inside 39 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 512
1 out of 515

Course coverage

MATH0409 reviews
MATH0205 reviews
MATH1415 reviews
MATH204 reviews
MATH404 reviews
Show 9 more courses
MATH040C3 reviews
MATHMATH2 reviews
104241 review
220691 review
MAT0151 review
MAT1411 review
MATH1201 review
MATH1401 review
MTH401 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

3

C+ 2 · C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

4

F 4

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2