AI Rate Professor

Communication

Desi Chavez-Appel

COMM100C · COMM20102 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
2/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless there are no alternatives and , and disorganization.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderUnorganizedAttendance strictSo many papersNot recommended
  • Both reviews rate the experience extremely poorly and .
  • Students describe , and stressful grading.
  • Attendance and behavior appear and phone penalties.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

25/100

Getting an A appears difficult because , and papers are burdensome.

There are no online reviews, so all grade-effort .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course feels harder than it should because expectations, organization, and .

There are no online reviews, and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

5/100

because one review says she grades every day students show up and .

There are no online reviews, and the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

0/100

Both students strongly reject taking her again because of , and workload.

There are no online reviews, and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Reviews , and inflexible expectations around her mistakes.

Format shift

because there are no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

The workload is described as paper-heavy and unnecessarily stressful.

Format shift

All workload because there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Both students describe poor organization, poor treatment, and ineffective teaching behavior.

Format shift

All teaching because there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and a final issue more than traditional exams.

Format shift

All assessment because there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The two in-person reviews are strongly negative, citing poor organization, , and excessive papers.

Main concern

The and unnecessary workload.

What students said

“she really did not do much to alleviate stress on students”
COMM100C
“She grades every single day you show up to class”
COMM20102
“There .”
COMM20102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but one review says the and students still had to meet her expectations.

Botched FinalStrict ExpectationsDaily Class Points

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but do not clearly prove proctoring, book rules, quiz format, or final format.

Botched FinalStrict ExpectationsDaily Class Points
“she botched the final and expected students to work around her mistakes”
COMM100C
“She grades every single day you show up to class”
COMM20102

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“ and most of the time she has no idea what she is doing”

⚖️

12/100

“She grades every single day you show up to class, and if she sees you using your phone.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

0/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and most of the time she has no idea what she is doing
  • and treat a COLLEGE class or retire.

Theme 2

📄

  • There .
  • She grades every single day you show up to class, and if she sees you using your phone.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • she really did not do much to alleviate stress on students
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there are only two reviews, although both are detailed and consistently negative.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

COMM100C1 review
COMM201021 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values