AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Phat Truong

ACC101B · ACC101 · ACCT102 · ACCT101B · ACCT101 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Take him if and lectures in exchange for , and a realistic path to an A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPatient accounting helpLots of homeworkFair examsLecture-heavySome self-teaching
  • Most students , and willing to help with accounting concepts.
  • The and some self-teaching, especially for students who dislike lecture-heavy courses.
  • Grades are fair and often high, but because lectures can be boring or unclear.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

An A , and steady effort, but the class is not a low-effort easy A.

Online evidence shows useful fair homework, while but also lots of homework and self-teaching.

Is the course easy?

Standard

49/100

Accounting concepts can be difficult, and and independent study to understand them.

Online evidence calls the , while and complaints about lecture-heavy self-teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

70/100

but not strict because he sometimes cuts class early and students mention skipping without missing too much.

; the online review does not discuss attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and fairness, but several disliked his teaching style and .

The single online review is highly recommended, while but clearly mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

72/100

as fair, exams are not too difficult, and appears in some reviews.

Format shift

Online grading evidence is limited but positive, while , and clear exam coverage.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

and sometimes heavy, but students often say it helps prepare them and group projects reduce the load.

Format shift

Both formats mention homework, with feel heavy.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

He is patient, knowledgeable, and caring, but some students find lectures boring, unclear, or too dependent on self-teaching.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is strongly positive but limited, while majority.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment , and exams rather than relying on one method.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions homework and assignments, while , and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed but lean positive, with praise for patience and , and self-teaching.

Main concern

Lecture-heavy classes and lots of .

What students said

“Lots of homework but it was fair”
ACCT101
“You have to do a lot of self teaching.”
ACCT101
“tells you exactly whats on the test.”
ACCT101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review is positive and , and paired with strong teaching.

Main concern

The online evidence is limited and .

What students said

“ and assignments but they are very useful”
ACCT101B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and fair because reviews say tests are covered in class and not too difficult, with .

Tests Not Too DifficultExam Topics Covered In ClassReviews do not clearly prove proctoring rules

Assessment risk

Standard

66/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or strict proctoring rules.

Tests Not Too DifficultExam Topics Covered In ClassClear Test Coverage
“ .”
ACCT101
“He .”
ACCT101
“tells you exactly whats on the test.”
ACCT101

Online

The online review does not clearly prove webcam use, Lockdown Browser, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and assignments but they are very useful in helping you understand the subject.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“He does a great job at explaining new concepts.”

📚 Workload Reality

45/100

“Lot's of homework.”

⚖️

72/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He .
  • His class is mostly just lectures, which can get really boring and difficult to learn from.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Fair amount of homework.
  • Lots of homework but it definitely helped me understand the materials much better.
  • and fair amount of .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Fit

  • You have to do a lot of self teaching.
  • Does not answer emails.
  • He's hard to understand, but does the hw in class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 14 reviews with enough detail, consistent workload themes, and a meaningful mix of positive and negative experiences.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 51
3 out of 54
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ACCT1017 reviews
ACCT1024 reviews
ACC1011 review
ACC101B1 review
ACCT101B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 7

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values