AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Hong Choi

MATH141 · MATH015C · MATH40 · MATH150A · MATH141C · MATH20 · MATH150AC · MATH15C · MATH150 · 150AC · CALC150A · MATH040 · MATH015 · CALCULAS · CAL150A · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
30%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take him only if you can teach yourself math and and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProFast PacedLots Of HomeworkEasy TestsWeak ExplanationsExtra Credit
  • Students often say tests are easy or straightforward, but .
  • Many negative reviews say he explains poorly, moves too fast, or expects prior knowledge.
  • He can work for , but beginners face high risk.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

An A can be reachable because tests are often easy and exists, but and weak explanations raise the effort cost.

Online evidence is too limited and negative about organization, while but lots of homework.

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

The math content is manageable for prepared students, but fast pacing and .

The online review only supports confusion about assignments, while and self-teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

because students can fall behind or miss group work, but strict enforcement is not consistent.

; the online review does not clearly prove a policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendations are mixed but skew negative because many students warn that and assigns too much work.

The lone online review is negative, while in-person reviews range from .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

, and passing despite weak test performance.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide most grading evidence; .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly report lots of , and fast section coverage.

Format shift

Both the online review and .

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Reviews often say , and expects students to already know the material.

Format shift

The online review criticizes organization, while and pacing.

Assessment method

Balanced

56/100

The course appears to combine substantial homework with frequent tests that many students call short or straightforward.

Format shift

; the online review only mentions assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

36 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed, with repeated complaints about fast lectures and lots of homework but some praise for and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“Unless you already know how to do all of the Math and it's a refresher course for you, it's very difficult to pass this.”
MATH015
“There IS a lot of homework, but also lots of . .”
MATH150A
“Easy A if you do all the work.”
MATH040

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review complains that the syllabus and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“His syllabus but they were not numbered”
MATH141

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe exams as short, straightforward, and often easier than the homework, but .

Short TestsStraightforward TestsPartial CreditFrequent Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe short and , but do not clearly prove book rules or proctoring.

Short TestsStraightforward TestsPartial CreditFrequent Tests
“Tests every other week (only 6 questions).”
MATH40
“ . really easy.”
MATH150
“ and open answer so partial credit is abundant!”
150AC

Online

The online review does not clearly prove any exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy A if you do all the work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 reviews, , and course fit; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“ ”

📚 Workload

28/100

“He gives way too much work.”

📝

68/100

“ and simple.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He goes through his lessons pretty fast which makes them hard to understand.
  • and when you asked questions you arent taken seriously
  • He teaches step by step and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There IS a lot of homework, but also lots of . .
  • Easy A if you do all the work.
  • He grades the tests leniently and there are only 6 problems each time

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Fit

  • Unless you already know how to do all of the Math and it's a refresher course for you, it's very difficult to pass this.
  • It will be very difficult if it is your first time taking intermediate algebra.
  • if you are going to take further .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-seven reviews across many years provide broad evidence, with consistent themes despite mixed opinions.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 58
3 out of 59
2 out of 57
1 out of 58

Course coverage

MATH409 reviews
MATH0406 reviews
MATH1504 reviews
MATH150AC3 reviews
CALC150A2 reviews
Show 10 more courses
MATH015C2 reviews
MATH1412 reviews
MATH150A2 reviews
150AC1 review
CAL150A1 review
CALCULAS1 review
MATH0151 review
MATH141C1 review
MATH15C1 review
MATH201 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 3