AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Jennifer Glancy

CHEM107C · CHEM107 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can , and an exam-centered course.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLecture HeavyMixed Teaching QualityHard Work RequiredExtra CreditFast Paced
  • Students are split between finding her inspiring and .
  • The course requires real work, reading, and outside help for many students.
  • and limited grading items mentioned.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some students earned A grades and exists, but comments repeatedly say the class takes hard work and self-study.

All grade and effort evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Chemistry content is challenging because students , and confusion without enough guidance.

All difficulty evidence is from in-person CHEM107 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

One student warns that skipping class means you will not pass, but .

Only in-person comments mention attendance risk, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Students are evenly split because some find her inspiring while others and rushed.

and strongly divided.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

helps, but some reviews say and few items.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss grading, and they conflict between and .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students describe , and long lectures.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Her teaching is polarizing, with praise for feedback and inspiration balanced by complaints about confusion and rushed pacing.

Format shift

and strong criticism, with no online comparison.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

86/100

Students mention , and grades based mainly on exams.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are sharply mixed, with two students praising her support and .

Main concern

Several students say lectures lack guidance and move too fast.

What students said

“Her class was not easy.”
CHEM107
“ .”
CHEM107
“Her lectures honestly confuse me”
CHEM107C

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The course appears exam-heavy with quizzes and a final, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, or closed-book rules.

4 ExamsAlmost Weekly QuizzesFinal ExamLecture-Based Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

quizzes, and one final, but do not clearly prove proctoring or book policy.

4 ExamsAlmost Weekly QuizzesFinal ExamLecture-Based Exams
“4 exams, .”
CHEM107
“ .”
CHEM107
“Does not put any homework, labs, or .”
CHEM107

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Her class was not easy. I had to put in a lot of and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“She gave tons of chemistry.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

50/100

“Her lectures honestly confuse me, Id take in 10% of everything she went over.”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“4 exams, .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her down to earth, positive attitude caused me to change my major.
  • .
  • She talks really fast.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Her class was not easy.
  • chance on every quiz.
  • Does not put any homework, labs, or .

Theme 3

🧪 About Study Needs

  • I had to put in a lot of and .
  • Youre textbook and tutors will be your bestfriend

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Four detailed in-person reviews from the same term show consistent workload concerns but mixed teaching opinions.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM1073 reviews
CHEM107C1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values