AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Benjamin Easton

PHIL170 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want a supportive philosophy professor and can keep up with .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring TeacherClear Practice-To-Test LinkHomework Every ClassBeginner-Friendly ExplanationsOne Mixed Lecture Concern
  • Most reviews describe Easton as caring, passionate, and focused on student success.
  • but usually routine and not too hard.
  • One negative review reports disorganized lectures and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Students report A , and , though one review says tests can be harsh.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

75/100

He makes philosophy concepts simple and repeats material until students understand, despite one complaint about scattered lectures.

Only in-person evidence exists, and most comments say the course is approachable.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

One review says to go to class, and the learning style appears .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

because , and invested in student success.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Students mention , and no surprises, with one opposing tough-grader report.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

, but students usually describe it as manageable and routine.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Most students , and patient review of concepts.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention regular homework plus tests, with classroom practice directly supporting assessments.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are mostly excellent, praising his care, clarity, and repeated practice, with one warning about scattered lectures and .

Main concern

and one report of .

What students said

“All concepts we needed to know on the .”
PHIL170
“The as heck to pass also.”
PHIL170

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are tied to practiced concepts and usually routine, but one student says they are hard and .

Routine TestsPractice Matches TestsHard Tests MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and are routine, but one review calls them hard and no open-book or closed-book policy is clearly proven.

Routine TestsPractice Matches TestsHard Tests Mentioned
“All concepts we needed to know on the .”
PHIL170
“There's really no surprises when it comes to the hw and .”
PHIL170

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Really great professor! Reaaaaaalllly wants all of his students to succeed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and care; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“One of the few professors I've had whose passion shows.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“If .”

📚 Workload

55/100

“ , but it's not too hard.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • One of the few professors I've had whose passion shows.
  • he made the material simple.
  • The class had a hard time keeping up with his lectures and notes because they were all over the place.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • .
  • , but it's not too hard.
  • The as heck to pass also.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Reaaaaaalllly wants all of his students to succeed.
  • He's very chill, and cares.
  • He also makes sure to create a safe environment for students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

, but three are strongly consistent and detailed.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL1704 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values