AI Rate Professor

Physical Education

Jeff Benito

PE139 · KIN230 · PE235 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

, not if you need to learn the material.

Best fit · Easy A HunterGPA BoosterVery EasyWeak TeachingShort ClassesLow Learning Value
  • Students repeatedly say the class is extremely easy and useful for raising GPA.
  • Most recent reviews strongly criticize teaching quality and say students learn very little.
  • The course appears low-effort, but it is a poor choice for students who need real kinesiology preparation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

96/100

Students repeatedly describe the class as a GPA booster where an A is very easy with minimal effort.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

92/100

The course content is described as very easy, brief, and not very challenging even for an intro class.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they consistently describe very low academic challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Roll is mentioned during very short class meetings, but .

, and there is no online attendance evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most because the class provides little learning value despite easy grades.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they are sharply split between easy-grade praise and teaching criticism.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

94/100

Students repeatedly say the class boosts GPA and gives easy A grades.

Format shift

.

Workload

Featherlight

95/100

Reviews describe very short classes and minimal academic demand.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews are available, and .

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Students often say he is friendly or interesting, but many say they learn almost nothing.

Format shift

In-person comments contain both older praise and newer strong criticism, with no online evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews mention roll, group projects, demonstrations, and few graded items, with .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

little teaching value and extremely short meetings.

Main concern

Students often say they leave without learning much.

What students said

“Good class if you want a good grade without learning anything.”
PE235
“Doesnt really go over much, i leave class not learning anything.”
KIN230
“super easy teacher! play tennis and gives you a A!”
PE139

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Good class if you want a good grade without learning anything.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“You will not learn much in this class”

📈 Easy Grade

96/100

“super easy teacher! play tennis and gives you a A!”

⚠️ Learning Risk

25/100

“If you NEED the .”

Theme 1

📈 About Grades

  • If you want !
  • if you need a GPA booster and want an A.
  • super easy teacher! play tennis and gives you a A!

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching

  • He is not a quality professor.
  • Doesnt really go over much, i leave class not learning anything.
  • You will not learn much in this class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

65/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews span several years and are consistent on easiness, but some are old and light on assessment detail.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

PE2356 reviews
KIN2301 review
PE1391 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1