AI Rate Professor

English

Mujib Tahir

ENG100C · ENG100 · ENG103 · ENGL100 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want a supportive English professor , and revision.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful FeedbackLenient GradingExtra CreditReading RequiredCaring Teacher
  • Students consistently describe him as caring, available, and .
  • Getting an A is very realistic if , and .
  • The class includes reading and papers, but students say the support makes the workload manageable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

An A is very reachable with , and , though students still need to complete the work.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Students say the class is not difficult, though reading, essays, and some hard prompts keep it from being effortless.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

65/100

Attendance is strongly encouraged because showing up and using feedback are central to success, but .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and helps students improve.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Students repeatedly mention leniency, clear criteria, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The class has reading and papers, but students describe the assignments as manageable and sometimes fun.

Format shift

, and ; no online workload evidence exists.

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

Students consistently praise , and supportive attitude.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews focus on readings, essay prompts, feedback, papers, and .

Format shift

In-person reviews describe assignment-based assessment, with no online evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are strongly positive, with students praising his feedback, availability, leniency, and .

Main concern

Students should expect reading, papers, and occasional hard prompts.

What students said

“Awesome professor who wants you to pass.”
ENG100C
“Easy to get an A, he works with his students, and he has very interesting lectures.”
ENG103
“Very lenient, works with the students very well.”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

proctoring policies.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Awesome professor who wants you to pass.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“Hes a really great teacher , he cares for his class”

📈 Easy A Potential

88/100

“Easy to get an A, he works with his students, and he has very interesting lectures.”

⚖️

90/100

“Very lenient, works with the students very well.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Awesome professor who wants you to pass.
  • Hes a really great teacher , he cares for his class
  • Overall, straight forward and too the !

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • As long as you show up and do the .
  • Easy to get an A, he works with his students, and he has very interesting lectures.
  • Also, he gives so !

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Get ready to read
  • Sometimes the prompts were hard but again he is always there for help.
  • SO MANY PAPERS

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Four consistent, detailed in-person reviews support the conclusions, but the sample is small and older.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1001 review
ENG100C1 review
ENG1031 review
ENGL1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1