AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Matthew Montegary

MATH041 · MATH141 · MATH41 · MATH110 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

unless you are comfortable self-teaching a fast, test-heavy math course with inconsistent preparation.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderTest HeavyDisorganizedLots Of HomeworkSelf Teaching Required
  • Most students strongly warn against taking him, especially in MATH110.
  • Common complaints include , and homework that does not match exams.
  • A few students say , but the dominant experience is high effort with poor support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Grades require heavy effort, self-teaching, and strong test performance, with little evidence of easy grading or .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Students , and content that often requires tutoring or self-study.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Multiple tags say skipping class means students will not pass, and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most because teaching, organization, grading, and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Many reviews tag him as a and , and grade-damaging.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and major self-teaching time.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Most students describe , and a need to learn the material elsewhere.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

The course is repeatedly described as .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, describing , and frequent self-teaching.

Main concern

Students repeatedly say and that support is weak.

What students said

“Terrible teacher, very disorganized, homework does not match with exams, and overall very lazy.”
MATH110
“I found myself having to self learn with .”
MATH110
“By far the .”
MATH110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear high-risk and difficult because students repeatedly say and review support is weak.

Test HeavyHard ExamsNo Clear Study GuidesHomework Does Not Match Exams

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

exams and weak preparation, but they do not prove book policy or proctoring rules.

Test HeavyHard ExamsNo Clear Study GuidesHomework Does Not Match Exams
“ .”
MATH110
“ w/ hw.”
MATH110
“This teacher does not prep you for the exams and does not provide study guides.”
MATH110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Please save yourself some time and take another professor!”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“Lectures were never clear and the .”

🧪

25/100

“ w/ hw.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

22/100

“ !!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • By far the .
  • He
  • The content of his lectures were reviewed one time and the type of algorithms being taught need repetition.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Pretty difficult class, especially the .
  • because each question is 20-30 pts.
  • I've had to spend an inordinate amount of time self-teaching and working with a tutor.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • .
  • This teacher does not prep you for the exams and does not provide study guides.
  • Lectures were never clear and the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen in-person reviews across multiple math courses , and teaching quality.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 59

Course coverage

MATH11010 reviews
MATH1412 reviews
MATH0411 review
MATH411 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

5

C+ 2 · C- 3

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1