AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

William Ohm

MATH240 · MATH40 · MAT20 · MATH123B · MATH20 · MATH15 · MATH020 · MATH10 · MATHN20 · MATH015 · MATH130 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you can study independently, attend consistently, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProStrict test gradingMixed teaching clarityNo homework structureAttendance mattersPolarizing professor
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, with and easy while many describe .
  • , and students frequently mention strict or .
  • The lack of but also leaves students without enough practice for math.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students say an A is possible with careful study, but and .

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The content can feel manageable for prepared students but because lectures may be fast, book-light, and unclear.

; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

, but students repeatedly say skipping class makes passing much harder.

; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

44/100

Recommendations are split because some students like his clarity while many warn about poor teaching and .

; there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

as strict or nitpicky, especially on exams and required solution format.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

74/100

Workload is light because several reviews say there is little or , but students must self-practice.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with but many reports of confusion, impatience, and poor support.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

90/100

and multiple reviews emphasizing tests.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are polarizing, with some students finding him easy and clear while many warn about and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ .”
MATH240
“He's good and .”
MATH123B
“ .”
MATH20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are risky because , and study guides that may not match the test.

Test HeavyStrict GradingNitpicky Format RequirementsStudy Guides May Not Match Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

31/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Test HeavyStrict GradingNitpicky Format RequirementsStudy Guides May Not Match Tests
“Gives you a study guide of whats on the test, and then you get the test and there is random stuff he never talked about.”
MATH240
“He knit picks every little thing on the test.”
MATH015
“overall grade is determined from the 5 Exams.”
MATH20

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“I just stay confued in his class.”

⚖️

28/100

“He knit picks every little thing on the test.”

📝

31/100

“overall grade is determined from the 5 Exams.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's good and .
  • I just stay confued in his class.
  • His lectures, are hard to understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • He knit picks every little thing on the test.
  • you will get a A

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Fit

  • If .
  • .
  • easy if you put time into it

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

and consistent evidence of a polarized experience.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 55
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH406 reviews
MATH203 reviews
MATH0152 reviews
MAT201 review
MATH0201 review
Show 6 more courses
MATH101 review
MATH123B1 review
MATH1301 review
MATH151 review
MATH2401 review
MATHN201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values