AI Rate Professor

English

Art Goldman

ENG102103 · ENGLISH103 · ENGL103 · ENG60 · ENGL102 · ENGL100 · ENG102 · ENG103ONLINE · ENG100 · ENG103 · 34 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you can handle essays and and an engaging English class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFunny discussionsEasy gradingEssay-heavyCurrent events focusMixed organization
  • Most students , and discussion-focused.
  • Grades are often described as easy or fair if students follow directions and .
  • The main downsides are rambling , and a writing-heavy structure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Many students call the class easy and say good grades are reachable by following directions, writing the essays, and showing up.

All authoritative evidence is in person, even though a few review texts mention online classes.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The content is usually manageable, but students still and make strong arguments.

All authoritative evidence is in person, with no online reviews counted.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

68/100

, and pop quizzes, but comments do not show a strict attendance rule.

All authoritative evidence is in person, with no online reviews counted.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students recommend him for his humor, fairness, and discussions, though some complain about organization and .

All authoritative evidence is in person, with no online reviews counted.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students often call him an easy or and essays meet expectations.

Format shift

All authoritative evidence is in person, with no online reviews counted.

Workload

Moderate

63/100

The workload is manageable but , and occasional weekly writing.

Format shift

All authoritative evidence is in person, with no online reviews counted.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students usually praise his humor, help, and discussions, but some find him rambling, boring, or unclear.

Format shift

All authoritative evidence is in person, with no online reviews counted.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Assessment appears , and in-class essays rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

All authoritative evidence is in person, with no online reviews counted.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person evidence shows a mostly well-liked, discussion-heavy English professor with and some complaints about organization.

Main concern

Students who need structured lectures or dislike essays may find the class frustrating.

What students said

“Quite a few essays but it was manageable.”
ENG103
“Really lazy, doesn't help on explaining how he wants the essays.”
ENG103
“As long as you put in the work, he will give you the grade!!!”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

notes may be allowed, with pop quizzes also mentioned.

In-Class EssaysNotes AllowedPop QuizzesResearch Paper

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

essays, pop quizzes, and research papers, but do not prove strict proctoring or closed-book exams.

In-Class EssaysNotes AllowedPop QuizzesResearch Paper
“he lets you use any sorts of notes during the in-class essays”
ENG103
“Gives plenty of pop quizzes and the tests are just in-class essays.”
ENGLISH103

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“As long as you put in the work, he will give you the grade!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 34 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and assessment. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Professor Goldman is a good teacher who is very willing to help his students.”

📈 Easy A Potential

82/100

“If you do your work and show up to class, you will get an A.”

⚖️

78/100

“He is a and .”

📝 Workload Reality

63/100

“Quite a few essays but it was manageable.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are interesting, and he loves Literature.
  • Class time consisted of debate and !
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very easy. Lots of movies.
  • and follow directions and you'll be fine.
  • Easy class, it requires some time and effort to write 4 essays and a research paper, but he grades very easy.

Theme 3

📝 About Assignments

  • Quite a few essays but it was manageable.
  • A and a few essays, but overall it was a fairly easy class.
  • The and if you didn't keep up with the due date on assignments then you ended up with a bad grade.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

34

Recent reviews read by the AI

34

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 34 reviews span many years and , and grading.

Inside 34 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 57
3 out of 57
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG10313 reviews
ENG604 reviews
ENGL1034 reviews
ENG103ONLINE3 reviews
ENG1002 reviews
Show 5 more courses
ENG1022 reviews
ENGL1022 reviews
ENGLISH1032 reviews
ENG1021031 review
ENGL1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values