AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Cynthia Hernandez

MATH120 · MATH15 · MATH10 · MATH20 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid her unless and tolerate .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesFrequent errorsSelf-teaching requiredTough testsCaring outside class
  • Most students say they had to teach themselves because .
  • Students repeatedly report that she makes errors and .
  • She is described as nice and accessible, but students .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting a high grade appears hard because students report , and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The math content becomes harder because students say the and full of errors.

, and they consistently describe difficulty in learning.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

as mandatory, but comments say she teaches from the first minute to the last and keeps students the whole time.

Only in-person reviews mention class time, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students overwhelmingly warn against taking her because they feel they cannot learn from her lectures.

All , and it is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

One student says she is picky and marks correct answers wrong if they are not written her way.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Reviews mention lots of , and needing extra self-study outside class.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most students say she , and leaves them teaching themselves.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they are consistently negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and lecture-heavy learning, but .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are consistently negative about unclear explanations, frequent mistakes, and poor learning support.

Main concern

Students repeatedly say they had to teach themselves and that she made many errors.

What students said

“Expect to teach yourself most of the course out of the book.”
MATH120
“students always correcting her, not fun.”
MATH20
“ ”
MATH20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention difficult tests but .

Tests Not Easy

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove exam policy or format.

Tests Not Easy
“ .”
MATH15

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Expect to teach yourself most of the course out of the book. Not a good teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Expect to teach yourself most of the course out of the book. Not a good teacher.”

⚠️ Accuracy Problems

20/100

“She always messing up on her problems. Students are always correcting her.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She doesn't know what she is talking about though!
  • She makes a lot of errors and her lectures are long and boring.
  • doesn't clarify so makes it hard to learn from her.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • She is very picky on answers.
  • If you struggle with !

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is willing to work with you outside of class which is awesome!
  • but she does make it very confusing for those of us who are not so good at math.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 8 reviews across several years show a consistent pattern, though some are old and grade data is limited.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH203 reviews
MATH1202 reviews
MATH152 reviews
MATH101 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1