AI Rate Professor

Marketing

Sue Hunter

MGT161 · MKT103 · MKT091 · MKTMGT · MKT110 · MKT210 · MKTNG210 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
37/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you can tolerate weak lectures and rely on the textbook for an easier grade.

Best fit · Self Taught ProEasy but unevenRepetitive lecturesNice personTextbook-based testsLow engagement
  • Reviews are and very weak teaching.
  • Several students say lectures are repetitive, off-topic, or not useful.
  • Getting an A can be easy if students attend and study the book.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

The A can be easy when students attend and use the book, but and weak teaching make it less automatic.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

The marketing content sounds basic, but poor lecture focus and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance is strongly implied as important, but .

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Students praise her personality, but because lectures feel repetitive, boring, or ineffective.

because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Several reviews call the class very easy, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

78/100

Workload appears light, with one review describing two simple projects and easy true-or-false exams.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Her field experience and friendliness help, but repeated complaints about boring, unfocused lectures pull teaching quality down.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Comments emphasize midterms, finals, and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but inconsistent class with frequent complaints about boring or ineffective lectures.

Main concern

Many students say class time adds little value compared with .

What students said

“Boring. Does not engage the class”
MKT103
“EASY A.”
MKT091
“DO NOT TAKE SUE HUNTER, PERIOD!!!”
MKTNG210

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

tests super easy and others saying they are hard and textbook-based.

Textbook-Based ExamsTrue-False MidtermTrue-False FinalHard Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals, including true-false tests, but do not clearly prove open-book or proctoring rules.

Textbook-Based ExamsTrue-False MidtermTrue-False FinalHard Tests
“ and ”
MKT103
“Midterm and Final are both 50 qs true/false. Super easy.”
MKT091
“ .”
MKT110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Nice lady but ineffective.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Boring. Does not engage the class”

📈 Easy Grade Potential

78/100

“EASY A.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

32/100

“DO NOT TAKE SUE HUNTER, PERIOD!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Boring. Does not engage the class
  • Her lectures were repetitive and retained no useful info, I learned nothing.
  • She talks alot about useless things.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Exams

  • EASY A.
  • Go to every class and study the book, and you will get an A!
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Personality

  • She's a great person, but a TERRIBLE teacher.
  • Overall a nice lady.
  • Nice lady but ineffective.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 11 detailed in-person reviews span many years and show a and weak teaching.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MKT0913 reviews
MKT1033 reviews
MGT1611 review
MKT1101 review
MKT2101 review
Show 2 more courses
MKTMGT1 review
MKTNG2101 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1