AI Rate Professor

Journalism

Brent Weber

JOUR101 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unless , because the only student report describes neglect and course instability.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnengagedProcrastinatesCourse DisruptedReading Required
  • The only review describes very poor instructor engagement.
  • The course was disrupted enough that .
  • The evidence .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

10/100

There is no evidence of an easy grade, and the only listed outcome is a withdrawal.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The review does not show unusually hard content, but poor course management likely made the class harder to complete.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

, because the only review reports disengagement and a teacher replacement.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

, and the only recorded grade outcome is withdrawal.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The only tag mentions reading, but the .

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

The only review says he did not seem to care and procrastinated until the course needed a teacher swap.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single in-person review says the professor seemed disengaged and delayed course work until a teacher swap occurred.

Main concern

The main concern is lack of care and procrastination by the instructor.

What students said

“It seemed as if he didn't seem to care for the class very much.”
JOUR101
“He was constantly procrastinating to the the end of the course.”
JOUR101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The format or policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He was constantly procrastinating to the the end of the course.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting the main theme of poor engagement. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“It seemed as if he didn't seem to care for the class very much.”

⚠️ Course Stability

8/100

“He was constantly procrastinating to the the end of the course.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • It seemed as if he didn't seem to care for the class very much.
  • He was constantly procrastinating to the the end of the course.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one older review with limited detail.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

JOUR1011 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1