AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Jeanne Thompson

ANTH102L · ANTRO102 · ANTH100 · ANTH102 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take Thompson if you will complete the work and use , but if you need an consistently engaging lecture style.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and accessibleExtra creditMixed difficultyLenient research paperBoring risk
  • Most students describe Thompson as kind, helpful, and responsive.
  • Grades can be manageable through work completion, , and .
  • because one review strongly warns against the class and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

An A or passing grade seems achievable if , and , but the evidence is mixed.

because every review is treated as in person under the supplied format counts.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

69/100

Several students call the class fairly easy, though some reviews .

Only in-person evidence exists, and it is mixed between easy completion and difficult experiences.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Reviews suggest showing up helps and may be enough to pass, but there is .

and class, with no online attendance evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students are positive because she is caring and helpful, but the warning review prevents a stronger recommendation.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

because students mention full credit on a weak paper and opportunities.

Format shift

All grading evidence is in-person, including one tough-grader tag that makes the picture mixed.

Workload

Moderate

67/100

The workload seems manageable with discussions, tests, papers, and , but not completely effortless.

Format shift

, though one negative review suggests the class may overwhelm some students.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students usually describe her as , and helpful, but one review calls the class boring and risky.

Format shift

and is mostly positive with one severe negative outlier.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment appears balanced across , and .

Format shift

In-person reviews mention tests, discussions, research papers, and , with no online evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and manageable grading, but include warnings about toughness and boredom.

Main concern

The main concern is inconsistent student experience, with some calling the class easy and one calling it a .

What students said

“She such a nice and caring person.”
ANTH100
“you really just need to show up for the test and class and you will pass the class.”
ANTH102L
“ !!!!!! MORE THAN HALF HER CLASS DROPPED”
ANTH102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and other assignments, but they do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, or closed-book policies.

Tests MentionedDiscussion QuestionsResearch PaperExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

61/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove the exam format, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Tests MentionedDiscussion QuestionsResearch Paper
“You can google the answers to the 3 test and get at least a passing grade on them.”
ANTH100
“you really just need to show up for the test and class and you will pass the class.”
ANTH102L
“There's 2 discussion questions you have to do each week”
ANTH100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you do the work you should have no problem passing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and mixed student experience. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“She such a nice and caring person.”

📈 Grade Path

76/100

“Just do all the discussion boards and and ull pass.”

⚠️ Mixed Experience

66/100

“ !!!!!! MORE THAN HALF HER CLASS DROPPED”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Helpfulness

  • If you ask for help she'll help you out as much as she can.
  • Also she answers emails right away.
  • She is a kind person.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Work

  • If u do the .
  • If you do the work you should have no problem passing.
  • she give you a bunch of to do.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Risk

  • when you mess up while working in work study, she will let you know.
  • !!!!!! MORE THAN HALF HER CLASS DROPPED
  • BORING....IF ...BRING LAPTOP FOR ENTERTAINMENT

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because only 7 reviews are available, and they and a severe negative warning.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ANTH1003 reviews
ANTH1022 reviews
ANTH102L1 review
ANTRO1021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values