AI Rate Professor

Journalism

Marc Posner

JOUR101 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want an engaging journalism class where steady writing and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging DiscussionsCaring TeacherKnowledgeableWeekly WritingEasy Test
  • Students describe Posner as knowledgeable, caring, and able to keep a night class engaging.
  • Grades appear very attainable if students complete weekly writing and participate in discussion.
  • The workload is writing-based but not described as stressful.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Both reported grades are A-level, and students say the main cost is submitting weekly writing on time.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The and writing expectations rather than hard technical content.

Only in-person comments describe the course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

Attendance is not explicitly called mandatory, but class.

Only in-person reviews mention the discussion-based class experience.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and makes class engaging.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Grades look generous when assignments are submitted on time, with A and A+ outcomes in the reviews.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

65/100

The class has weekly writing assignments, but students describe them as manageable.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently describe him as caring, knowledgeable, engaging, and fun.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment appears mostly writing-based, with one easy test mentioned.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students praise the class as engaging, discussion-heavy, and easy to pass with timely writing work.

Main concern

You need to keep up with weekly writing and news discussion.

What students said

“he kept the class engaged by encouraging class discussion.”
JOUR101
“Just make and you'll be good!”
JOUR101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The only exam evidence is one student calling the test easy, so but not fully documented.

Easy Test

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence only supports that there was an easy test, with policy.

Easy Test
“The class consists of and an easy test.”
JOUR101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Marc is really cool! He's very knowledgeable and genuinely cares for students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“He's very knowledgeable and genuinely cares for students.”

📈 Grade Value

88/100

“Just make and you'll be good!”

💬 Class Engagement

95/100

“he kept the class engaged by encouraging class discussion.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's very knowledgeable and genuinely cares for students.
  • The class is fun, given you can carry a conversation and are aware of the world around you.

Theme 2

📝 About Workload & Grades

  • The class consists of and an easy test.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

Two detailed but and positive, but the sample size is small.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

JOUR1012 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values