AI Rate Professor

English

Jy Ho

ENG103 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unless you can work independently and are comfortable with unclear guidance and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear guidanceTough graderChill classWeak teachingGood discussions
  • The only review strongly criticizes his teaching clarity and guidance.
  • The class may feel relaxed, but as tough.
  • Evidence is very limited because there is only one in-person review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

The class may be chill, but the only review says he is a and bad at giving guidance.

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The course atmosphere sounds relaxed, but navigate.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

No online or .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

The student explicitly says he is weak as a professor despite the class being chill.

The recommendation signal .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

The only review directly calls him a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The review calls the class chill but gives no detailed workload description.

Format shift

Workload evidence is limited to one in-person comment.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

The review describes him as , and poor at giving guidance.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

No format-specific assessment details are clearly supported.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single in-person review says the class is chill but criticizes his clarity, guidance, and grading.

Main concern

The main concern is poor guidance combined with .

What students said

“ funny.”
ENG103
“He's bad at giving guidance and is a yet encourages creativity.”
ENG103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, proctoring, book policy, or .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He's bad at giving guidance and is a yet encourages creativity.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting the main themes of and ; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“ funny.”

⚖️

25/100

“He's bad at giving guidance and is a yet encourages creativity.”

👍 Recommendation Level

15/100

“Class discussions can be good but he sucks as a professor.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • funny.
  • Class discussions can be good but he sucks as a professor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • because it's chill.
  • He's bad at giving guidance and is a yet encourages creativity.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one review, even though it contains specific criticism.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values