AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Tina Johannsen

PT130C · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
11/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless you have no other option and can handle poor organization with a hard class.

Best fit · Self Taught ProBoringHardUnorganizedArgumentative
  • Both reviews rate the class as very hard and very low quality.
  • Students describe the teaching experience as , and unpleasant.
  • There is beyond one reported A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

One student reported an A, but both reviews describe the class as very hard, so getting an A does not look easy.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The only direct course difficulty comment says the class is hard and boring.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, but .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

Students give very low ratings and describe the professor as unorganized and unpleasant.

, and both are negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

40/100

There , though one A suggests grading is not proven to be impossible.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The class is described as hard, but reviews do not give specific workload details.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students describe the professor as , and difficult to deal with.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and both criticize the teaching experience.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, but assessment methods are not described.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are strongly negative, focusing on disorganization, boredom, and high difficulty.

Main concern

Students report poor organization and a hard, boring class.

What students said

“Boring and hard”
PT130C
“ .”
PT130C

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clear

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or .

Exam Policy Not Clear

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and difficulty. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“ .”

⚠️ Course Difficulty

25/100

“Boring and hard”

👎 Recommendation Risk

10/100

“ but the Psych Tech program is very small.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Boring and hard
  • .

Theme 2

⚠️ About Classroom Experience

  • She get mad if you don't agree with her.
  • but the Psych Tech program is very small.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and they are brief, though both are consistently negative.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PT130C2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values