AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lawrence Trang

STATS120 · MATH141 · MATH142 · A1 · MATH120 · MATH15 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you are comfortable learning math quickly and keeping up with .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerFast paced lecturesHeavy homeworkPolarizing teachingConfusing explanationsStrict classroom
  • Reviews are sharply split, but many students describe fast lectures, confusion, and weak support.
  • Homework and quizzes are frequent, so grades require steady effort rather than minimal work.
  • Students who already like math report clearer value than beginners who need slower guidance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

An A appears possible for prepared students, but , and difficult tests make it high effort.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The math content is made harder by fast pacing, , and limited beginner support.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Reviews say he keeps students for every minute of class, but they do not clearly prove a .

Only in-person comments mention classroom time expectations.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Several students praise his knowledge, but the because lectures feel rushed and confusing.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students describe strict expectations, difficult tests, and the .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

Many reviews mention lots or tons of , and demanding preparation.

Format shift

Workload evidence is entirely in person.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Positive reviews call him knowledgeable and passionate, but many negative reviews cite confusion, rushing, and poor support.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Comments mention homework, quizzes, tests, practice quizzes, and a and exams.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and knowledge help some students but overwhelm many others.

Main concern

The main concern is fast, confusing instruction paired with .

What students said

“ homework and lacks fundamentals,confusing and extremely fast paced !!!”
MATH120
“He is very knowledgeable and controls the classroom well.”
MATH142
“lots of homework but in a way you need to know them to understand the damn thing.”
MATH15

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests, practice quizzes, and a final, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or .

TestsPractice QuizzesFinal Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final but do not clearly prove the .

TestsPractice QuizzesFinal Mentioned
“Focus on the types of problems on the practice quizzes. If you can do these you will do fine on the tests.”
MATH142
“class started with 40s students, now it downs to 17 even we still have 2 months to the final ; .”
MATH120

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ homework and lacks fundamentals,confusing and extremely fast paced !!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Pace was way too fast unless you know the material.”

📚 Workload Pressure

20/100

“Tons of .”

⚖️ Recommendation Risk

35/100

“I would strongly suggest that .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very good and exceptional lecturer
  • Lectures are long and confusing.
  • He rushes through lectures, doesn't know how to instruct and is incomprehensible.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Pay attention in class and do all of the homework.
  • lots of homework and quizzes. be prepared
  • Study hard & you'll do well

Theme 3

❤️ About Student Experience

  • He's a nice guy if you tell him what you don't understand he can work with you.
  • He lacks compassion for his students and may do better at another proffession.
  • Would not have him again.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset has 17 reviews over many years with consistent themes about pacing, workload, and polarized teaching quality.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 55
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH1208 reviews
MATH154 reviews
0151 review
A11 review
MATH1411 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH1421 review
STATS1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values