AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Cathleen Clay

PHIL101 · PHIL160 · PHIL204 · PHIL202 · PHIL172 · PHIL170 · PHIL100 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you can handle PowerPoint-heavy philosophy lectures and are willing to attend and study steadily.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful when askedPowerPoint-based lecturesPhilosophy can be confusingEasy tests with preparationSometimes boring
  • Most students say she is kind and willing to clarify difficult philosophy material.
  • The workload is manageable, but , and study PowerPoints.
  • Opinions split because some students find her lectures boring or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Getting an A looks realistic with , and steady effort rather than minimal work.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The course structure is usually simple, but .

All comments are in-person, with no online evidence to compare.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as strictly mandatory, but students repeatedly say showing up and paying attention are important.

and class participation.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and helpful, though several warn that lectures can be dull or unclear.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Homework and tests are often described as forgiving, with and some mentioned.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

63/100

Workload usually consists of journals, notes, PowerPoints, tests, and occasional presentations .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

She is usually seen as kind, knowledgeable, and helpful, but her lecture style can be boring or .

Format shift

Teaching comments are entirely from in-person classes.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Reviews mention , and multiple-choice or long-answer tests.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a manageable but sometimes dull class , and studying lecture materials.

Main concern

Lectures can be boring or confusing if students are not actively following along.

What students said

“ and you will do fine.”
PHIL170
“The material itself is sort of hard to get a grip on at first but once you get used to it, it's a very easy class.”
PHIL172
“ and you'll be fine.”
PHIL170

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams vary by course but are generally manageable with PowerPoint notes, review sheets, and steady studying.

Multiple Choice TestsReview SheetsMidterm And FinalLong Answer ExamsCheat Card Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention multiple-choice tests, midterms, finals, long-answer exams, and one course allowing a 3 by 5 cheat card.

Multiple Choice TestsReview SheetsMidterm And FinalLong Answer ExamsCheat Card Mentioned
“ and you will do fine.”
PHIL170
“ ,and difficult.u can bring a 3 by 5 cheat card.”
PHIL202
“ as the final.”
PHIL100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and be clear about everything.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“ and be clear about everything.”

📘 Course Difficulty

58/100

“The material itself is sort of hard to get a grip on at first but once you get used to it, it's a very easy class.”

⚖️

72/100

“Full credit on HW just for doing it (even with wrong answers).”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • if you don't understand something.
  • She is a excellent teacher and very helpful
  • She does her lectures in a very weird way she goes on and on about who knows what then 30 minutes later gets to the point.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • and you'll be fine.
  • The class is tough. Not so much the structure, but it's just the material that can be difficult to grasp.
  • .

Theme 3

📝 About Exams And Work

  • Everything in exam is in her powerpoints,but u need to listen to her lecture,if .
  • This class had 5 hw journals, 1 argumentative essay, and a midterm and a final.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen in-person reviews across many years give consistent , and grading.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 56
3 out of 54
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL1007 reviews
PHIL1705 reviews
PHIL1011 review
PHIL1601 review
PHIL1721 review
Show 2 more courses
PHIL2021 review
PHIL2041 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values