AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Jess Gibson

PSYCH161 · PSYCH101 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
73/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take him if and , but be aware that organization may vary by class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardOpen-Notes ExamsClear When GoodMixed OrganizationHelpfulDropped Lowest Exam
  • Most students praise Gibson for making psychology and statistics understandable and engaging.
  • Exams can be student-friendly because open notes and a .
  • and paid course materials that were abandoned.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A looks achievable with attendance and assignments because exams are open-notes and one review says showing up leads to a good grade.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

Students often say he makes material easy to understand, though one and tested untaught content.

All course and is mixed by section.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

Attendance seems important for learning and grades, but reviews do not .

, and no online evidence exists.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and helpful policies, but one severe negative review lowers confidence.

and includes both strong praise and one strong warning.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Open-notes exams, dropped lowest exam, and comments about .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Assignments and chapter reading are expected, but workload is not described as overwhelming.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Several students praise his clarity and helpfulness, but and .

Format shift

Teaching evidence is all in-person and noticeably inconsistent.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

Comments emphasize tests, four exams, and .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

clarity and open-notes exams but one serious complaint about disorganization.

Main concern

Teaching organization may be inconsistent.

What students said

“His style of teaching makes things really easy to understand.”
PSYCH101
“ and unorganized.”
PSYCH161
“You can use open notes and anything that is handwritten.”
PSYCH161

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because reviews mention open notes, handwritten notes allowed, and a .

Open NotesHandwritten Notes AllowedLowest Exam DroppedTests Not Hard

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a dropped lowest score.

Open NotesHandwritten Notes AllowedLowest Exam Dropped
“ .”
PSYCH101
“4 exams and the lowest score is dropped..”
PSYCH161
“You can use open notes and anything that is handwritten.”
PSYCH161

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“His style of teaching makes things really easy to understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“His style of teaching makes things really easy to understand.”

📝

88/100

“ .”

⚠️ Consistency Risk

45/100

“ and unorganized.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Makes you want to show up to class.
  • He made everything so easy to understand and made a 4 hour night class bearable.
  • and unorganized.

Theme 2

📈

  • .
  • 4 exams and the lowest score is dropped..
  • If you show up to the class and turn the experience and have a good grade.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • He didn't know what he was doing.
  • .
  • Made us pay $90 for a website he stopped using because he didn't know how

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

and recent consistency for 2015, but opinions are sharply mixed.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PSYCH1012 reviews
PSYCH1612 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values