AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Fredrick Gumm

ESL63 · ESL063 · ESL186 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
87/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

, but expect to work for a strong grade.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring TeacherHighly RecommendedClear Grammar HelpHard For Good GradeSupportive Personality
  • Students strongly praise him as caring, helpful, and personally memorable.
  • as clear and easier to understand.
  • Several reviews suggest good grades require real effort despite positive teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

Students love the instructor, but comments and reported grades suggest a good grade takes effort rather than being automatic.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Grammar , but students still describe the class as hard for good grades.

Only in-person reviews describe course easiness.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly state an .

No online evidence exists, and .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students repeatedly recommend him because , and memorable as a teacher.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Reviews suggest grades are not easy, but there is .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload is not described in detail, but the course requires enough effort that students mention difficulty earning good grades.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss effort, with limited workload detail.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students consistently describe him as awesome, caring, helpful, and strong at explaining grammar.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify whether the course relies more on assignments or exams.

Format shift

In-person comments do not clearly prove the assessment mix.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

as caring, helpful, and excellent at explaining ESL material, while noting grades can be hard.

Main concern

The main concern is that earning a good grade may be difficult.

What students said

“It's hard for good grade.”
ESL63
“When he explained the grammar rules, they look easy :)”
ESL63
“Great teacher! Really cares about your academics!”
ESL63

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exams, proctoring, open-book policies, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Mr. Gumm is one of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, care, recommendation, and grade effort. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“Mr. Gumm is one of the .”

❤️ Student Support

92/100

“Great teacher! Really cares about your academics!”

📈 Grade Effort

54/100

“It's hard for good grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • When he explained the grammar rules, they look easy :)
  • Mr. Gumm is awesome! you will like his teaching and the man so sure!
  • Awesome teacher!

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • He is such an amazing human, and if !!! :)
  • Great teacher! Really cares about your academics!
  • I LOVE him, he absolutely helped me a LOT.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It's hard for good grade.
  • Nice teacher but not exciting or interesting class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Seven in-person reviews from the same period are strongly consistent about teaching quality but and exams.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ESL635 reviews
ESL0631 review
ESL1861 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values