AI Rate Professor

English

Valarie Tuttle

ENG58 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.7

The decision

Take Valarie Tuttle only if you want easy English work and can tolerate inconsistent teaching quality.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyMixed Teaching QualityVery Easy WorkHelpful OnlineUnclear ExpectationsTreats Students Like Children
  • Reviews and a very negative classroom experience.
  • The course work appears easy, but expectations and .
  • , though the sample is small.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

The work is described as very easy, but .

Online evidence is supportive, while but poorly directed.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

86/100

Students describe the English work as very easy and beginner-level.

, though in-person reviews are less positive about delivery.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendation depends on format and fit because one student felt helped while another strongly warned against taking her.

The online review is positive, while the and include a strong warning.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

The work seems easy, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The assignments are easy, but one student says there was a lot of work.

Format shift

Online feedback focuses on improvement, while .

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

and inspiring to terrible and unclear.

Format shift

, while and includes the harshest criticism.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The comments center on essays and .

Format shift

Both formats discuss writing or .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed, with one short positive comment and one and childish treatment.

Main concern

Students may find the class easy but poorly explained.

What students said

“Great teacher”
14104
“Treated us like children.”
ENG58
“She gave us a lot of work but didn't tell us how she wanted it all done.”
ENG58

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The online and improved the student's writing confidence.

Main concern

There is only one online review, so the positive signal is limited.

What students said

“However this teacher helps me a great deal, and she also inspired .”
21510
“Because of her class I am a much better writer.”
21510

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The format or .

Online

The online review does not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Teacher was terrible. This was her first year teaching college and she taught third grade prior.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“However this teacher helps me a great deal, and she also inspired .”

⚠️ Classroom Risk

35/100

“She gave us a lot of work but didn't tell us how she wanted it all done.”

📘 Course Easiness

86/100

“Work was way too easy.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • However this teacher helps me a great deal, and she also inspired .
  • Great teacher
  • Treated us like children.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Work

  • Work was way too easy.
  • She gave us a lot of work but didn't tell us how she wanted it all done.

Theme 3

👍 About Outcomes

  • Because of her class I am a much better writer.
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

, and the comments conflict across format and year.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

141041 review
215101 review
ENG581 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1