AI Rate Professor

Journalism

Michael Brookshire

GLOBALMEDIA · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
5/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless you can handle constant testing, group dependence, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerWeekly TestsHeavy Group WorkLong LecturesVague Study GuidesHarsh Experience
  • The only review describes a very heavy workload with weekly tests and group presentations.
  • The and test performance.
  • Teaching experience is described as rude, long, and broadly difficult.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

10/100

The review suggests grades are hard to control because of , and dependence on group quality.

All because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

The course sounds demanding because students are tested weekly from a book with vague study guides and long lectures.

Only one in-person review describes course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review does not clearly .

No online or .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

The student strongly discourages the class because the workload is intense, support is vague, and everyone struggled.

Recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

The review suggests grades can become harsh when group work goes poorly and tests carry major pressure.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

5/100

, and book-based studying make the workload sound overwhelming.

Format shift

All workload .

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

The only student describes him as rude, lecture-heavy, vague, and difficult to learn from.

Format shift

Teaching evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears split between weekly group presentations and weekly tests.

Format shift

Only the in-person review describes assessment methods.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single in-person review reports , and a very difficult experience.

Main concern

The class appears high-pressure, group-dependent, and poorly supported.

What students said

“Group and long long lectures.”
GLOBALMEDIA
“If your group sucks, you're basically going to be stuck with a bad grade unless you're an amazing tester.”
GLOBALMEDIA
“Not to mention, he is super rude, everyone struggled.”
GLOBALMEDIA

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The because tests happen weekly and study guides are described as vague, but reviews .

Weekly TestsVague Study GuidesBook-Based Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The and vague study guides but does not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, or .

Weekly TestsVague Study Guides
“ ”
GLOBALMEDIA
“study guides had to be asked for and they're still super vague.”
GLOBALMEDIA

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not to mention, he is super rude, everyone struggled.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in workload, testing, and teaching experience. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“Not to mention, he is super rude, everyone struggled.”

📚 Workload Pressure

5/100

“Group and long long lectures.”

⚖️ Grade Risk

15/100

“If your group sucks, you're basically going to be stuck with a bad grade unless you're an amazing tester.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • Group and long long lectures.
  • You're basically given a book and tested on it

Theme 2

🧪 About Tests

  • study guides had to be asked for and they're still super vague.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • If your group sucks, you're basically going to be stuck with a bad grade unless you're an amazing tester.
  • Not to mention, he is super rude, everyone struggled.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only , so the negative pattern is serious but weakly evidenced.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

GLOBALMEDIA1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values