AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Linda Ternes

MATH115 · MATH108 · G180CALCULUS · G180 · MATH180 · MATH150 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid unless you are strong in math and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHard testsHarsh gradingUnclear expectationsHeavy dedication required
  • Students describe the grading as unusually strict, especially on showing work.
  • as harder or different from what is taught.
  • A few students say , but the overall tone is negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because students report , and sharp grade drops despite prior math success.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course content feels challenging because tests and as harder than the classroom instruction.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Most students advise against taking her because grading and .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Students repeatedly describe the grading as unrealistic, picky, and very difficult.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload pressure , and the need for extreme dedication.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Some students say she teaches well or is nice, but and weak alignment between teaching and tests.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

Student complaints focus heavily on quizzes and tests rather than assignments.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person , and unclear expectations.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ .”
G180CALCULUS
“ .”
MATH180
“Extreme dedication required.”
G180

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as hard and graded strictly, with .

Hard TestsStrict Step-by-Step GradingUnclear Alignment

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but do not clearly prove book, proctoring, or final exam rules.

Hard TestsStrict Grading
“ .”
MATH180
“ ”
G180
“i was marked down for not showing every single step.”
G180CALCULUS

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If this was your last . Period.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“She teaches well in class and you pretty much understand it but the so her teaching doesn't help.”

⚖️

10/100

“ .”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

20/100

“If this was your last . Period.”

Theme 1

📉 About Grades

  • i got a C+
  • I always got A or a high B in math and now I have a D-
  • she grades very difficultly

Theme 2

🧪 About Tests

  • .

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , but not easy or .
  • Too much theory not enough of the Math.
  • She will help you during her office hrs

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Six older but , though there are no recent or online reviews.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

G1801 review
G180CALCULUS1 review
MATH1081 review
MATH1151 review
MATH1501 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH1801 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values