AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Noureddine El Alam

PRECALC130 · STAT120 · MATH105 · PRECALCULUS · MATH130 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Only take Noureddine El Alam if you are strong in , and are prepared for difficult tests.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerVery hard testsConfusing lecturesAttendance problemsInconsistent teachingOne strong positive outlier
  • Most students describe the class as .
  • , though one student says they are manageable with homework.
  • Older and newer reviews conflict slightly, but the negative pattern is much stronger.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A may be possible for prepared students, but comments show heavy studying and .

All grade and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Math content feels harder because , and difficult tests.

Only in-person reviews exist, and most describe a challenging course experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews mention instructor absences but do .

All attendance-related evidence is from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most students warn against taking him because of , and unreliable class coverage.

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person and mostly negative, with one strong positive exception.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Students report , and one claim of .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students describe intense studying, homework, tutoring, and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload and effort.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

One student praises his explanations, but .

Format shift

All teaching evidence comes from in-person reviews, with one positive review against several negative ones.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

Reviews repeatedly focus on tests as the central and most difficult assessment.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, absences, and poor alignment between class and exams.

Main concern

Students often felt underprepared because .

What students said

“his class is VERY HARD and TESTS.”
MATH105
“ .”
STAT120
“ , would not follow the book”
PRECALCULUS

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The because students and one says material was tested without being covered.

Hard TestsTests on Uncovered MaterialChallenging Exams

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

students felt was not covered well.

Hard TestsTests on Uncovered MaterialChallenging Exams
“Tested on material he didn't cover.”
MATH130
“ .”
STAT120
“ but easy if you did the .”
MATH105

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🧮 Teaching Quality

32/100

“ , would not follow the book”

⚠️

22/100

“ .”

👍 Positive Outlier

30/100

“ .”

Theme 1

🧪 About Tests

  • his class is VERY HARD and TESTS.
  • .
  • but easy if you did the .

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and goes into detail as to why it is that way.
  • , would not follow the book
  • He was fun but yet a .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Reliability

  • Instructor was regularly late or cancelled class last minute.
  • he was absent 5 times during the semester!!
  • Tested on material he didn't cover.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

and are mostly consistent, though dates are old and one review is strongly positive.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1052 reviews
MATH1302 reviews
PRECALC1301 review
PRECALCULUS1 review
STAT1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values