AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Diana Clarke

ACC101 · ACCT191 · ACCNT101 · ACCT102 · ACCT101 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself accounting with .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing explanationsDisorganized gradingSelf-teaching requiredHeavy homeworkAvoid if possible
  • Most students say and force them to teach themselves.
  • Workload and the course level should be.
  • A few students call her nice or helpful, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even with a few high grades, students , and a .

Both formats are negative, with in-person evidence much stronger because it has 17 reviews versus one online review.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Accounting becomes much harder because and students often must learn concepts alone.

In-person reviews repeatedly call the course difficult, while the single online and organization.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

One in-person review says students must stay the full class even after finishing work, but a .

Only in-person evidence mentions required class time; the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students advise avoiding her because and .

The online review says take her only if there is no other choice, and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Grades vary, but , and high expectations make the grading feel strict rather than generous.

Format shift

, while the online review reports disorganization but includes an A.

Workload

Heavy

21/100

Several students report lots of , and expectations that feel excessive.

Format shift

Heavy workload is mainly supported by in-person reviews, with the online review adding deadline confusion.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students , and often makes them teach themselves.

Format shift

Both formats criticize teaching, but the and more consistent.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Comments mention homework, projects, in-class assignments, exams, and .

Format shift

Assessment evidence is mostly in person, while the online .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews overwhelmingly describe confusing teaching, unclear directions, heavy work, and a .

Main concern

Students repeatedly say lectures and answers do not help them understand accounting.

What students said

“We spent all of our time trying to figure out teh concepts on our own.”
ACCT101
“ and really bad teaching style.”
ACC101
“Everything I learned, I taught myself.”
ACCT101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is highly negative and , and missed deadlines.

Main concern

The online course appears poorly managed and confusing.

What students said

“ , poor time management, always changes her mind, does not stick to deadlines, etc.”
ACCT101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and poor alignment, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Exam Questions Not AlignedUnclear DirectionsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and unclear directions but do not clearly prove the .

Exam Questions Not AlignedUnclear Directions
“the in class.”
ACC101
“ and exams.”
ACCT101

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Everything I learned, I taught myself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk; credibility rating: High.

Teaching Quality

18/100

“ and kind, but not a good professor.”

Recommendation Risk

18/100

“ .”

Workload Pressure

21/100

“ and really bad teaching style.”

Theme 1

Teaching Style

  • Her answers do not answer the question.
  • She pretty much just reads off the powerpoints.
  • After asking her a question you're .
  • Everything I learned, I taught myself.

Theme 2

Difficulty And Grades

  • Extremely difficult class.
  • and exams.
  • the in class.
  • and really bad teaching style.

Theme 3

Recommendation

  • .
  • .
  • if you have no other choice.
  • If .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen reviews across a short time span show highly consistent complaints with detailed examples, though the online sample is only one review.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 513

Course coverage

ACCT10112 reviews
ACC1012 reviews
ACCT1022 reviews
ACCNT1011 review
ACCT1911 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Audit/No_Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Rather_Not_Say 1