AI Rate Professor

Biology

Jacqueline Duvall

BIO101 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you are ready to study lecture notes heavily and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHelpful teacherLecture-note testsHeavy studyingTime intensiveTextbook not needed
  • The professor is described as nice and helpful.
  • The course demands a lot of studying and time, especially for non-biology majors.
  • , so staying current is essential.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

The only review reports a B and says the class requires lots of studying, constant review, and significant time.

All evidence comes from one in-person BIO101 review; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The course is challenging because it requires heavy studying of lecture notes and can be intimidating for non-majors.

, and it strongly emphasizes time and study demands.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review does .

The but does not clearly prove an ; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

The professor is nice and helpful, but the course is only worth it for students willing to study heavily.

and mixed between helpful teaching and heavy workload.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

The , but the workload is heavy and the only reported grade is a B.

Format shift

Grading evidence comes from one in-person BIO101 review.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The review repeatedly says the class requires lots of studying, review, and time.

Format shift

Workload evidence is entirely from the in-person review and is clearly heavy.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

The professor is described as nice and .

Format shift

Teaching and is positive but limited.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

The and does not mention major assignments beyond lab materials.

Format shift

Only the in-person review .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The as nice and helpful but warns that BIO101 requires heavy studying and constant review.

Main concern

The class takes a lot of time and punishes falling behind.

What students said

“Lots of studying!”
BIO101
“Teacher is nice, helpful and new.”
BIO101
“DONT FALL BEHIND.”
BIO101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, or .

Lecture-Note TestsStudy-Heavy Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The notes, but does not clearly prove open-book status or proctoring rules.

Lecture-Note TestsStudy-Heavy Exams
“study her notes 100% test from the lecture notes.”
BIO101
“its alot review it.”
BIO101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Lots of studying!”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching, exams, and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

📚 Workload Demand

25/100

“class takes a lot of time from you.. unless your a bio geek..”

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Teacher is nice, helpful and new.”

📝

55/100

“study her notes 100% test from the lecture notes.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Lots of studying!
  • DONT FALL BEHIND.
  • class takes a lot of time from you.. unless your a bio geek..

Theme 2

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Teacher is nice, helpful and new.
  • study her notes 100% test from the lecture notes.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one review, though it gives , and materials.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

BIO1011 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values