AI Rate Professor

Business

David Wassenaar

MGT199 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
77/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

He looks promising from the single review, but the evidence is too thin for a strong recommendation.

Best fit · Easy A HunterWell likedEasy courseLimited evidence
  • The only review is very positive and calls him a favorite teacher.
  • The reported grade is an A and difficulty is low.
  • There is too little detail to .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

The only reviewer earned an A and rated difficulty low, but the comment gives no detail about effort required.

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The low difficulty rating suggests an easier course, but the comment does not describe the content.

, so the format evidence is limited.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The .

Only one in-person review exists, and it .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

The student is enthusiastic, but one vague review is not enough for a .

All recommendation evidence comes from a single in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

An A with low difficulty suggests lenient outcomes, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

70/100

Low difficulty suggests a light experience, but workload is not explicitly described.

Format shift

The .

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

The student strongly likes him, but the review gives no specific teaching evidence.

Format shift

, so confidence is limited.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not .

Format shift

No assessment-method evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The single in-person review is enthusiastic but .

Main concern

The evidence is only one short comment with almost no course details.

What students said

“MA FAVORITE TEACHER!”
MGT199
“Dave is da bestest”
MGT199

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the exam format, difficulty, open-book status, proctoring, midterm, or .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The single in-person review does not mention .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“MA FAVORITE TEACHER!”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

👍 Student Enthusiasm

78/100

“MA FAVORITE TEACHER!”

📈 Grade Outcome

78/100

“Dave is da bestest”

Theme 1

❤️ About Student Sentiment

  • MA FAVORITE TEACHER!
  • Dave is da bestest

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

, so the rating is weak despite the positive tone.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MGT1991 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values