AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Katrina Bisseti

ENGR102 · ENGR102C · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a and can handle some unclear expectations.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful and approachableProject-heavy gradingLow material costMixed clarityIndustry insight
  • Students mostly praise her as helpful, approachable, and willing to support struggling students.
  • The course depends heavily on a .
  • One review warns that while she is still refining her teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

61/100

Getting an A looks possible with and a , but the project-heavy grading keeps it from being easy.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The course starts hard and the , but support and practical material make it manageable.

Only in-person reviews describe the course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

because students have a lab every week.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

, and knowledgeable despite some clarity issues.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Grades appear tied mostly to the final project, with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Weekly labs and a a light one.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Students mostly describe her as helpful and approachable, but one review says .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews emphasize labs and a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a , and a final project that carries major grade weight.

Main concern

The and .

What students said

“Bisetti is extremely helpful, she will answer every question you have thoroughly and will even seek you out if she sees you struggling.”
ENGR102C
“The and is worth like half of your grade in the calss.”
ENGR102
“ and at times, unrealistic with her expectations.”
ENGR102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove exam format or .

Final ProjectExam policy unclear
“Most of your grade is on the .”
ENGR102C
“The and is worth like half of your grade in the calss.”
ENGR102

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Bisetti is extremely helpful, she will answer every question you have thoroughly and will even seek you out if she sees you struggling.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and cost. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“Katrina is a great teacher and easily approachable.”

⚖️

55/100

“Most of your grade is on the .”

💬 Mixed Clarity

58/100

“ and at times, unrealistic with her expectations.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Bisetti is extremely helpful, she will answer every question you have thoroughly and will even seek you out if she sees you struggling.
  • Katrina is a great teacher and easily approachable.
  • She is a great teacher that works in the industry and has a lot of insight.

Theme 2

📌 About Workload & Grades

  • .
  • Most of your grade is on the .
  • The and is worth like half of your grade in the calss.

Theme 3

💵 About Cost

  • The cost for her class is fairly low-one kit for $26.
  • NO TEXTBOOK FOR THIS CLASS!
  • Just a packet of sketching materials for 25$.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Four older but detailed and mostly consistent in-person reviews give useful evidence with limited sample size.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGR1023 reviews
ENGR102C1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values