AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

E. Alicia Theodore

ESL185 · ESL186 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid this professor unless , and inconsistent student experiences.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnfair grading concernsStrict deadlinesPolarizing help qualityDifficult ANegative classroom tone
  • Most reviews describe unfair or .
  • A few students say she is helpful and .
  • Deadlines and for grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

20/100

Multiple students say getting an A is very hard because and strict.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The ESL work itself may be manageable, but and deadlines make the course feel challenging.

Only in-person reviews describe the course, and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

, but strict timing and late penalties suggest low flexibility.

Only in-person evidence exists, and it .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most students warn against her because they see the grading and classroom treatment as unfair.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Several students report unfair grading and say few or no students earn A .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

as not easy but not very hard, with available.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

One review praises her help, but most describe poor treatment, unfairness, and boring teaching.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they are sharply mixed but mostly negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Comments mention , and a final, suggesting a mix of assignments and exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with and strict timing.

Main concern

and difficulty earning an A.

What students said

“nobody gets an A .”
ESL186
“grade VERY unfair for some student w/ no reason”
ESL186
“She replied all my emails.”
ESL185

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a , and final, but do not clearly prove proctoring or .

Take-Home Draft ExamEssay TestFinal MentionedReviews do not clearly prove proctoring policy

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

test, and final, but do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules.

Take-Home Draft ExamEssay TestFinal MentionedReviews do not clearly prove proctoring policy
“None of us received an "A" on the .”
ESL186
“nobody gets an A .”
ESL186
“it was .”
ESL186

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“grade VERY unfair for some student w/ no reason”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

15/100

“grade VERY unfair for some student w/ no reason”

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“borin teachin in classtime.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

30/100

“ .”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • nobody gets an A .
  • grade VERY unfair for some student w/ no reason
  • but not very hard,have extra credits.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a good teacher.
  • borin teachin in classtime.
  • .

Theme 3

⏰ About Rules

  • Too picky on time.
  • Try to be on time because she takes off lot of .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because six old reviews show a but limited modern evidence.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ESL1865 reviews
ESL1851 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values