AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Agnes Faltas

CHM107 · 111A · CHEM111A · CHEM107C · C111A · CHM111A · CHEM · CHE111A · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
60/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take her if you will read the book, ask questions, and use , but expect and harder exams.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and helpfulMixed teaching clarityEasy quizzesDifficult examsExtra credit and strict details
  • Recent reviews are much more positive than older reviews.
  • Students often call her caring and helpful, but .
  • Quizzes and help, while exams and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

, and some lenient policies help grades, but and strict detail grading prevent an easy A.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The chemistry content is manageable with reading and questions, but and .

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Reviews mention accepted late work and postponed tests, but .

Only in-person evidence exists, and it covers .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

65/100

Many students recommend her for support and grading opportunities, but and .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

66/100

Students , and accepted late work, though some report picky grading and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The class , and reading, but several students still describe it as manageable.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

She is often described as caring and helpful, but multiple students .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and newer reviews are more positive than older ones.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Grades appear , and a final.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a caring professor with , and sometimes hard exams or .

Main concern

Students may need to self-study from the book when lectures leave gaps.

What students said

“She is willing to help you understand if you don't get something.”
CHEM111A
“ , but .”
CHEM111A
“ is beyond hard.”
CHE111A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe easy quizzes and study-guide-based tests, but also difficult exams and a .

Easy QuizzesDifficult ExamsBrutal FinalStudy GuidesReviews do not clearly prove proctoring policy

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

guides, and a hard final, but do not clearly prove proctoring rules.

Easy QuizzesDifficult ExamsBrutal FinalStudy GuidesReviews do not clearly prove proctoring policy
“ , but .”
C111A
“ .”
CHEM111A
“ is beyond hard.”
CHE111A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is willing to help you understand if you don't get something.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“She is willing to help you understand if you don't get something.”

⚖️

66/100

“A lot of points for .”

📚

50/100

“ , but .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is by far one of the .
  • Her .
  • she definitely has not grasped the concept of teaching lower level chem.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • A lot of points for .
  • . .
  • w/ that knowledge everyone should get an A.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams and Work

  • , but .
  • is beyond hard.
  • SO . .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 14 reviews provide detailed, consistent themes across several years, though the evidence is old.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHEM111A7 reviews
111A1 review
C111A1 review
CHE111A1 review
CHEM1 review
Show 3 more courses
CHEM107C1 review
CHM1071 review
CHM111A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values