AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Cheryl Gibby

MATH141 · MATH40 · C20 · MATH20 · MATH020 · MATH40C · MATH040 · 89 lifetime ratings

AI rating
55/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you are ready to work hard and use study guides or SI, but if you struggle with math basics or need a slower lecture style.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy HomeworkFair but StrictFast PacedHelpful If AskedPolarizing Math Teacher
  • many students call her caring and well-prepared, while many others find her boring, fast, and confusing.
  • The class usually rewards effort, but students repeatedly mention lots of , and strict grading details.
  • She fits motivated math students better than beginners who need a slow pace or lively lectures.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is possible for students who do all the work and master reviews, but many reviews stress that it requires sustained effort.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

The math content is challenging because students repeatedly , and needing strong prior skills.

Only in-person reviews discuss course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Attendance seems important for keeping up, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

, while no online evidence exists.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

56/100

, while beginners or students who dislike math often strongly warn against her.

All recommendation evidence is from in-person reviews, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Grading is often called fair with partial credit, but many and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Workload is heavy because students repeatedly mention lots of , and study guides.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

, and helpful for some students, but , and too fast.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Assessment mixes online , and finals, with tests often carrying heavy grade impact.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and polarizing math professor who can prepare committed students well but overwhelms others with pace and workload.

Main concern

Students often complain about heavy online homework, fast pacing, monotone lectures, and .

What students said

“It's a LOT of work, but that's math for you.”
MATH020
“She's not easy but she's very fair.”
MATH40
“Class pace is EXTREMLY fast. You get A LOT OF HW.”
MATH141

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and calculators allowed, but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or proctoring rules.

Hard TestsLong Study GuidesPractice ExamCalculators Allowed

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and some student-friendly preparation, but exam security rules are not clearly proven.

Hard TestsLong Study GuidesPractice ExamCalculators Allowed
“Calculators are allowed in her class.”
MATH20
“ If you are not really good at math you will not pass her class.”
MATH20
“also gives a !”
MATH141

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's not easy, but she's very fair.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“She is organized and and .”

📚 Workload Reality

25/100

“It's a LOT of work, but that's math for you.”

📈 Effort For Grade

58/100

“if you do the HW you'll be fine.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • on what you didn't get, and provides SI sessions.
  • Shes monotone!
  • , but is always willing to help when you need it.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She's not easy but she's very fair.
  • you must be up for a real challenge if you want to do well in this class.
  • She is picky about showing your work.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • She does assign a lot of work but it is necessary to understand the material.
  • Class pace is EXTREMLY fast. You get A LOT OF HW.
  • Do the golden review and know how to do those problems and you'll get an A on the test.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

89

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews provide detailed, repeated themes across many math courses and years.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 538
4 out of 513
3 out of 514
2 out of 514
1 out of 510

Course coverage

MATH2021 reviews
MATH4013 reviews
MATH1417 reviews
MATH0405 reviews
MATH0202 reviews
Show 2 more courses
C201 review
MATH40C1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values