AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Jacque Swartout

ANTHR101 · ANTH101 · ANTH102 · ANTH107 · ANTHR102C · ANTHR102 · ANTHR101L · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you are comfortable with , and a professor whose style some students strongly dislike.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerKnowledgeable but inconsistentUnclear organizationHeavy reading and writingPolarizing attitudeInteresting lectures
  • Students split sharply between finding her knowledgeable and .
  • Anthropology content can be interesting, but workload and organization are recurring risks.
  • Getting an A is possible, but students , and self-motivation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A is possible, but comments , and effort rather than an easy path.

All counted evidence is from in-person reviews, with no online reviews in the authoritative counts.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The course material is science-heavy and reading-based, with several students calling it hard or intimidating.

Only in-person reviews are counted, so .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

The reviews do not clearly establish a .

, and it is sparse.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Recommendation depends heavily on whether students tolerate her style, because reviews range from great .

, though some comments mention online experiences without qualifying as online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Some students report getting an A, but , and .

Format shift

The .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of reading, essays, articles, books, labs, and exams.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

She is described as knowledgeable and sometimes engaging, but , and difficult to deal with.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews , and finals, so assessment is mixed.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed, with strong praise for knowledge and lectures offset , and workload.

Main concern

The main concern is inconsistent organization and .

What students said

“She KNOWS her stuff!”
ANTHR101
“both times were horrible,very unorganized,a lot of work, must have books, expects too much.”
ANTHR102
“Lab class was HORRIBLE.”
ANTHR101L

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention midterms, finals, lab identification questions, and an in-class essay, but .

MidtermsFinalLab practical style questionsIn-class essay

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and lab-style finals, but does not clearly prove closed-book, proctoring, webcam, or open-book rules.

MidtermsFinalLab identificationIn-class essay
“1 was pretty easy.”
ANTHR101L
“ , but with bunch of skulls, and in ”
ANTHR101L
“3 papers, two of them being 7 page and one of them 2 page, then 3 midterms”
ANTHR101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Class was really hard, but she made it fun and interesting. Do all the reading and you'll be fine!”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“ detail and adds more info about something by relating it to the worlds situation.”

⚖️ Workload Risk

28/100

“both times were horrible,very unorganized,a lot of work, must have books, expects too much.”

👍 Recommendation Split

42/100

“ !!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She KNOWS her stuff!
  • Fun and interesting lectures, extremely well-paced.

Theme 2

📚 About Difficulty & Workload

  • Class was really hard, but she made it fun and interesting.
  • It's not an easy "A" it's a hard science class...
  • 3 papers, two of them being 7 page and one of them 2 page, then 3 midterms

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • Way too much attitude.
  • She's mean and annoying.
  • nice teacher really...she is pretty chill haha..you dont need the books

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

There are 15 reviews with detailed but old and highly mixed comments, which supports moderate confidence.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ANTH1017 reviews
ANTHR1012 reviews
ANTHR1022 reviews
ANTH1021 review
ANTH1071 review
Show 2 more courses
ANTHR101L1 review
ANTHR102C1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values