AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Tim Quandt

PHIL170C · PHILISOPHY · PHILOSOPHY · PHILOSOPHY100 · PHIL100 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
81/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you want an engaging philosophy instructor and , and submit work on time.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear ExplainerEntertaining LecturesHelpfulPhilosophy Can Be ConfusingNo Late Work
  • Students consistently describe him as funny, helpful, and able to make philosophy understandable.
  • The material can be confusing, but careful notes and .
  • Grades depend on completing work on time, with limited tolerance for late assignments.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Students suggest passing and doing well is realistic, but the grade , and on-time work.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Philosophy is repeatedly described as detailed and confusing, but .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

because students say showing up and doing the work are central to the grade.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

84/100

Students recommend him because , and enjoyable.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grading seems manageable but not especially forgiving because and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The , and frequent precis in some courses.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Students , and able to make class enjoyable.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

, and written assignments.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are strongly positive, emphasizing clear explanations, fun class meetings, and manageable grades with steady work.

Main concern

Philosophy content and written work can be confusing if .

What students said

“ to understand.”
PHIL100
“ entire grade!”
PHIL100
“ .”
PHIL100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests, essays, and a final, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or .

TestsFinalEssaysStudy Required

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a final, but do not clearly describe exam rules or proctoring.

Two TestsFinalEssays
“Points are limited - 2 essays, 2 tests, 1 final - Study and it will be *easy* to pass”
PHIL100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ to understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“ to understand.”

📚 Difficulty Balance

52/100

“Philosophy is a hard subject, very detailed and confusing and whatnots...”

⚖️

58/100

“make sure you do all work assigned on time, because .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Smart & interesting teacher.
  • very upbeat, keeps class entertaining.
  • Great .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Material is difficult but for at least a passing grade.
  • entire grade!
  • Study and it will be *easy* to pass

Theme 3

❤️ About Personality

  • He's dorky and makes class meetings fun.
  • , and weird.
  • Helpful, Understanding, and U learn alot.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Ten , but they are old and lack grade data.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL1006 reviews
PHIL170C1 review
PHILISOPHY1 review
PHILOSOPHY1 review
PHILOSOPHY1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values