AI Rate Professor

Communication

Joshua Levenshus

COM100 · COMM101 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

He looks like a strong choice for students who want an engaging communication class with practical value and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyAmazing LecturerReal-World SkillsFair GraderNever BoringRespectful
  • Both reviews are extremely positive and describe him as engaging and practical.
  • Students say he grades fairly and treats students like adults.
  • The limited review count makes the signal promising but not highly broad.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

One review says he grades fairly and the average difficulty is low, but there is not enough evidence to call it effortless.

All evidence comes from two in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The course seems accessible because students describe the lectures as interesting, current, and useful.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

, but students say he makes them want to come to class.

, and no clear policy is proven.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Students strongly recommend him because he is engaging, fair, practical, and respectful.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

72/100

The evidence of harsh grading.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

75/100

Reviews do not mention heavy workload and the average difficulty is low.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Both reviews describe him as engaging, practical, respectful, and never boring.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

The only specific assessment mentioned is speeches, so the course .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

students, and practical communication lessons.

Main concern

The main limitation is that .

What students said

“He provided great lecture, speeches were interesting, grades fairly.”
COM100
“He treated us like adults.”
COMM101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention speeches but .

SpeechesExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“speeches were interesting”
COM100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“THIS TEACHER IS AMAZING!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and practical value. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“THIS TEACHER IS AMAZING!!”

👍 Recommendation Level

95/100

“LOVE HIM!”

⚖️

72/100

“He provided great lecture, speeches were interesting, grades fairly.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He provided great lecture, speeches were interesting, grades fairly.
  • He is never boring and won't waste you time!!!

Theme 2

💼 About Practical Value

  • gives you skills you can use in the real world.
  • I learned alot about communication for work and my relationships!

Theme 3

❤️ About Respect

  • He treated us like adults.
  • This teacher is very young and current.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

, so the sentiment is very positive but limited.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COM1001 review
COMM1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values