AI Rate Professor

Nursing

AL Botello

NURS196 · NURS297 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you value a and can tolerate some organization issues.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHelpful clinical guideAccommodatingSoft spokenSometimes disorganizedSupportive questioning
  • Students describe him as helpful, accommodating, and focused on student success.
  • Clinical guidance is supportive, especially when students struggle with questions or skills.
  • The main drawback is disorganization and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Students describe him as helpful and not very difficult, but .

All evidence comes from in-person clinical reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

The clinical work seems manageable with his guidance, though new sites and .

Only in-person reviews discuss course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

No online or .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Students generally recommend him because , and invested in their success.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Reviews do not call him harsh, but one student says .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Clinical work appears normal and manageable, but confusion about expectations adds effort.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Students repeatedly describe him as helpful and supportive, despite some disorganization.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Comments focus on clinical skills, care plans, and guidance rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews portray him as helpful and disorganization.

Main concern

and grading.

What students said

“ as to what needs to get done when”
NURS297
“ and really took time to give us hints on how to do well in clinical”
NURS196
“He will ask you questions and will help guide you through the questions if you are not getting it.”
NURS196

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, or book policy.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Overall, he is accommodating to his students and there for them to succeed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in clinical support, teaching, and organization. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“Overall, he was good teacher.”

❤️ Student Support

76/100

“ and really took time to give us hints on how to do well in clinical”

⚠️ Organization

55/100

“ as to what needs to get done when”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • GREAT INSTUCTOR
  • Mr. Botello is very soft spoken but a great guy!!
  • Overall, he was good teacher.

Theme 2

🩺 About Clinical Support

  • and really took time to give us hints on how to do well in clinical
  • He will ask you questions and will help guide you through the questions if you are not getting it.
  • and tried to be there whenever you needed him.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

56/100

Evidence confidence

Four older reviews give consistent themes about supportiveness but and assessments.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NURS1963 reviews
NURS2971 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values