AI Rate Professor

Art

Jamison Carter

ART100C · ART100 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you can tolerate a rough lecture style and just need a manageable art requirement.

Best fit · Self Taught ProCondescending LecturesEasy TestsAttendance NeededBook Work
  • Students found the and homework.
  • because class work and activities happen in person.
  • The course workload sounds moderate, but the teaching style is the main problem.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Tests and as easy if students pay attention, but .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The course content sounds basic and activity-based, but long lectures made the experience harder.

Only in-person reviews describe the course, so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

One review directly says students have to be in class.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Students mainly criticize the professor's attitude even though the assignments and tests are manageable.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they lean negative on the classroom experience.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

65/100

Tests and as to the point and easy when students pay attention.

Format shift

The .

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The workload appears to , and tests without signs of overload.

Format shift

Only in-person comments describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

The professor is described as condescending and the lectures as painful despite manageable coursework.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

, and in-class activities.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe manageable coursework but a painful lecture experience and .

Main concern

The main concern is a condescending teaching style that made lectures hard to sit through.

What students said

“He made the three hours of lecture painful and art is one of .”
ART100C
“pretty okay class, just book work and some in class activities, gotta be in class though!”
ART100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and homework but do not clearly prove exam format, book policy, or proctoring details.

Tests MentionedHomework Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and homework but do not clearly prove whether exams are open-book, closed-book, or otherwise restricted.

Tests MentionedHomework Mentioned
“his Tests and and pretty easy if you actually paid attention”
ART100C

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He made the three hours of lecture painful and art is one of .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“He was extremely condescending.”

📈 Grade Effort

68/100

“his Tests and and pretty easy if you actually paid attention”

🪑 Attendance

25/100

“gotta be in class though!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This teacher is no ray of sunshine.
  • He made the three hours of lecture painful and art is one of .
  • He was extremely condescending.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Grades

  • his Tests and and pretty easy if you actually paid attention
  • pretty okay class, just book work and some in class activities, gotta be in class though!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only , so the pattern is useful but weak.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART1001 review
ART100C1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values