AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Arthur Hoang

SDGDG2352 · CHEM101 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

unless newer information confirms a better teaching experience.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing ReviewsPoor Teaching ConcernLimited Evidence
  • , so confidence is low.
  • One review is strongly positive but gives almost no detail.
  • The detailed review describes very poor teaching and personality issues.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

The low average difficulty suggests the class may not be hard, but comments give no clear proof of .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The comments do not describe the course content enough to judge it beyond the mixed difficulty ratings.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

The detailed review strongly discourages taking him because of poor teaching and personality concerns.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they conflict sharply.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

There is .

Format shift

and too thin to separate by format.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

.

Format shift

All workload evidence is in-person and no online evidence exists.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

The only detailed comment describes him as a very poor teacher despite one vague positive review.

Format shift

In-person reviews are split, and there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, but the only detailed review is very negative.

Main concern

The main concern is poor teaching quality based on the detailed negative review.

What students said

“He was the my life.”
CHEM101
“:D Hi doctor!”
SDGDG2352

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He was the my life.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and student experience. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“He was the my life.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

30/100

“His unbelievably horrible personality tops off his poor teaching skills.”

📉 Evidence Limit

20/100

“:D Hi doctor!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Quality

  • He was the my life.
  • I have no words for how bad of a teacher he is.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • His unbelievably horrible personality tops off his poor teaching skills.
  • :D Hi doctor!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and one has almost no usable detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM1011 review
SDGDG23521 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values