AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Nhan Zuick

STAT10 · CAL2WS · MATH450 · MATH425 · STAT1006538 · STATS10 · MATH31 · STAT610 · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating
69/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
68.97%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take Nhan Zuick if you are willing to participate, ask for help, and accept a professor with very mixed reviews.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but polarizingExtra creditAccessible outside classTough grading complaintsMath support
  • Many students strongly praise Zuick for , and .
  • Negative , and frustration when students ask questions.
  • The experience is highly polarized, so students who actively seek help and participate are more likely to benefit.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Good grades are possible with effort, participation, and , but and no partial credit can raise the cost.

and , while online evidence is too limited and conflicted for a firm pattern.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The math and statistics content can feel difficult, though supporters say she gives shortcuts and .

, and online reviews range from confidence-building support to severe frustration.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Several reviews warn that attendance and participation matter, with tags like Skip class? You won't pass.

In-person reviews strongly support attendance importance, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

69/100

She is recommended by many engaged students, but and communication keep the recommendation conditional.

and warnings, while online reviews are too few and mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and dropped grades help, but complaints about no partial credit and .

Format shift

, while one online review specifically claims inconsistent grading.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

and sometimes described as not excessive, but several reviews mention lots of homework and test-heavy work.

Format shift

, and more clearly than the small online sample.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Many students call her caring and helpful, but repeated complaints about attitude, clarity, and organization make the experience uneven.

Format shift

In-person reviews are sharply polarized, while online reviews are too limited and split to change the overall pattern.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Assessment , and occasional take-home work.

Format shift

, and take-home exams, while online assessment evidence is sparse.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are polarized, with many students praising her help and while and communication.

Main concern

Some students report , and difficult classroom interactions.

What students said

“ and gives you short cuts to make math easier!”
STAT10
“She doesnt give partial credit its either correct or not.”
STAT610
“She offers and the .”
STAT10

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online evidence is limited and split between strong praise for support and one .

Main concern

The small online sample includes a .

What students said

“ and makes learning about math fun.”
Math31
“STAY AWAY from this teacher.”
MATH450
“ , and she lacks common sense.”
MATH450

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam style varies, with some student-friendly take-home work but and no partial credit.

Some take-home quizzesOne take-home exam mentionedTests and pop quizzesNo partial credit complaints

Assessment risk

Varies

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and one take-home exam, but also strict grading complaints.

Take-home quizzesTake-home examPop quizzesStrict partial-credit policy
“a .”
MATH425
“A few times she let and .”
MATH425
“She doesnt give partial credit its either correct or not.”
STAT610

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, webcams, or Lockdown Browser use.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Difficult class but not impossible. She is very reasonable as long as you talk to her and do your work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“ and gives you short cuts to make math easier!”

⚖️

55/100

“She doesnt give partial credit its either correct or not.”

👍 Recommendation Level

69/100

“You will get a good grade if you try.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She always answered all my questions and taught me how to use technology to solve problems and save time.
  • She makes the class pass by so quick and she helps you a lot.
  • She is horrible at explaining the material.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She offers tutoring outside of class and a lot of opportunities.
  • Never had a professor prior who would take off -30 for missing one step.
  • No-one in my class failed her class.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support & Communication

  • She completely helped me even on weekends.
  • When you ask for help she refuses to help or grows frustrated with you.
  • She truly cares about her students and wants all her students to pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

28

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 29 reviews span many years and give detailed, consistent evidence of a polarized experience.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 56

Course coverage

STAT1016 reviews
MATH4504 reviews
STATS103 reviews
MATH4252 reviews
CAL2WS1 review
Show 3 more courses
Math311 review
STAT10065381 review
STAT6101 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 5 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

12

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 8 · Rather not say 3