AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

John Hasenbein

CHEMISTRY · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
69/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want strong teaching and can tolerate a demanding chemistry class with a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardKnowledgeable lecturerLenient partial creditRigorous chemistryStandardized final riskMixed grading fairness
  • Students praise his lectures and chemistry knowledge, but the course is consistently described as rigorous.
  • and late work, yet the standardized final creates serious grade risk.
  • The hard for a professor who can make chemistry engaging.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

An A is possible with strong effort and , but exams and the .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The chemistry content is repeatedly called rigorous or hard, even by students who liked the professor.

All course-difficulty evidence comes from in-person chemistry reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

Participation matters appears often, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

, and online evidence is absent.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

Students split between strong praise for his teaching and and .

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Partial credit and late-work leniency help, but exam and lenient.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The class is described as rigorous and homework.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Most positive reviews describe him as knowledgeable, effective, and engaging, while negative and exams.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Comments emphasize exams, a , and .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show strong teaching and , but several students warn that exams and the .

Main concern

The standardized final and .

What students said

“He made me want to learn more about chemistry.”
Chemistry
“ and late work.”
Chemistry
“ , and 10 people dropped his class, including me.”
Chemistry

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

with no cheat sheet and limited recovery options.

Standardized FinalNo Cheat SheetTest HeavyNo Makeup Points

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

cheat sheet, and test-heavy grading.

Standardized FinalNo Cheat SheetTest HeavyNo Makeup Points
“ ”
Chemistry
“ ”
Chemistry
“He gives a ”
Chemistry

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great professor. U could get a question so very wrong and still receive half credit on an answer.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“He made me want to learn more about chemistry.”

⚖️

58/100

“ and late work.”

🧪

30/100

“ , and 10 people dropped his class, including me.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The professor is very knowledgeable and you'll have fun in it.
  • I found his lectures, teaching style, and method of tutoring very effective.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class overall is very rigorous but if you put time and effort into it you'll definitely pass.
  • and late work.
  • , and 10 people dropped his class, including me.

Theme 3

📝 About Exams

  • be prepared to take a . 12 and 13.
  • He gives a because he needs to know how he's doing.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

67/100

Evidence confidence

Five recent reviews give useful but mixed evidence, with strong disagreement between satisfied and dissatisfied students.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

Chemistry5 reviews

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values