AI Rate Professor

English

Monique Vidales

ENGL1B · ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENGL1B03996 · ENGL68 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
40/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

if you can handle frequent writing and ; in-person evidence is more positive but limited.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerEssay heavyHeavy online workloadConfusing instructionsCaring in personTough but passable
  • Recent online ENGL68 reviews are strongly , and stressful grading.
  • Older online and in-person reviews are more , and writing growth.
  • Grades can still be high, but students often describe the workload and as costly.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

High grades are possible, but many students , and stress rather than an easy A.

Online evidence is mixed and recently negative, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

40/100

The English content is not described as conceptually impossible, but the , and .

Online difficulty is driven by workload and instructions, while as tough but worthwhile.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

, and online reviews do not provide a flexible attendance policy.

; online reviews do not clearly establish attendance rules.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

and in older online sections, but recent online reviews strongly warn against taking her.

Online reviews are mostly negative in recent ENGL68 sections, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Students report , and rubrics not being followed, though some still earned A grades.

Format shift

Strict grading complaints are mainly online, while .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Online reviews repeatedly , and stressful weekly writing.

Format shift

Online workload is heavy, while as reading and effort but less extreme.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

She is described as caring and accessible in positive reviews, but recent online students criticize poor structure and .

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is mixed and recently negative, while the .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Grades appear driven mainly by essays, papers, discussions, readings, assignments, and a .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize writing and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and describe a caring, relatable professor, but both still say the class requires work.

Main concern

and the course is tough despite strong support.

What students said

“The .”
ENGL1B
“She wants you to pass her class but you will have to work for it.”
ENGL1B03996

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are mixed but recently trend negative, with , and grading stress outweighing older positive comments.

Main concern

Online students repeatedly report heavy writing and .

What students said

“Expect to write 4-6 pages per week along with .”
ENGL68
“confusing and contradictory instructions”
ENGL68
“Follow directions and guaranteed A.”
ENGL1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention essays, a , and a final project, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or .

EssaysFinalTextbook TestFinal Project

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

proctoring, only reading and writing-related course work.

Online

, and a final project, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

EssaysFinalTextbook TestFinal Project
“3 essays, 1 final.”
ENGL1B
“A few essays and .”
ENGL1A
“ ”
ENGL68

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“if i could go back in .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“She's a and happy to answer any questions.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“Expect to write 4-6 pages per week along with .”

⚖️

32/100

“Provided a , and docked points for no apparent reason.”

Theme 1

✍️ About Writing Load

  • Much heavier workload than all other summer courses I've taken.
  • Expect to write 4-6 pages per week along with .
  • A lot of .

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's attentive and understanding.
  • She is relate-able, down to earth and genuinely wants her students to succeed.
  • Her lectures were poorly structured, with useless visuals and text completely out of sync with the audio.

Theme 3

⚖️

  • i would fix a mistake that , and she still said it was wrong.
  • There are often long-winded sentences describing an assignment and the very next sentence contradicts it.
  • Follow directions and guaranteed A.

Theme 4

🏫 About Format Difference

  • The fact that it is online bums me out since the professor was easily accessible, I could only assume that an in person class would of been a better learning experience.
  • The .
  • It was a tough class but I enjoyed it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews across online and , though the two in-person reviews are too few for strong format-specific certainty.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENGL684 reviews
ENGL1A2 reviews
ENGL1B2 reviews
ENG1A1 review
ENGL1B039961 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1