AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Kenneth Lindleaf

SOC10 · SOC16 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

Take him if you want a effort is strongly rewarded.

Best fit · Easy A HunterClear expectationsEasy AAmazing lecturesParticipation mattersSupportive
  • Students unanimously rate him highly and describe his classes as , and relevant.
  • Getting an A is very realistic if students complete weekly work, read, participate, and study straightforward material.
  • Online sections have predictable weekly discussions, journals, and quizzes, while , and exams.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

92/100

An A is very attainable because assignments and and easy as long as students read, participate, and submit weekly work.

Online reviews emphasize easy weekly work, while , and straightforward exams.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

86/100

Students describe the sociology content as , and easy to understand even for returning or first-time students.

Online and in-person reviews both describe the material as are made easy.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

as strictly mandatory, but in-person students repeatedly say showing up and participating matter.

Online sections center on weekly submissions, while and participation.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

100/100

Every reviewed student who gave a , and comments are strongly enthusiastic.

Both online and in-person reviews are consistently positive, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

91/100

Grades are very favorable because expectations, study guides, and and most reported grades are A-range.

Format shift

Online reviews point to easy weekly tasks, while and clear study expectations.

Workload

Light

84/100

Work is steady but , and occasional projects.

Format shift

Online sections have weekly recurring tasks, while but and participation.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students consistently describe him as , and engaging.

Format shift

Both formats show excellent teaching evidence, with online reviews especially praising structure and accessibility.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Assessment appears balanced between , and exams depending on section.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize assignments and quizzes, while , and study guides.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews praise his lectures, organization, participation-based class culture, and straightforward tests.

Main concern

Showing up, participating, and keeping up with notes are important.

What students said

“The work isn't hard, but showing up and participating is important.”
SOC10
“ in class.”
SOC16
“ if you study and pay attention in class.”
SOC10

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews describe a predictable and easy structure built , and clear communication.

Main concern

Students still need to read and manage weekly due dates.

What students said

“ , and quizzes”
SOC10
“If you read the textbook you'll easily get an A in this class.”
SOC10
“The only way you'll fail this class is if you don't make any effort.”
SOC10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are described as , and reviews do not clearly prove strict proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Weekly QuizzesStraightforward TestsStudy GuidesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe straightforward or , but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or .

Straightforward TestsStudy GuidesFairly Easy Exams
“ in class.”
SOC16
“ if you study and pay attention in class.”
SOC10
“Gives study guides and tells you exactly what is going to be on the test.”
SOC16

Online

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes, but do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book exams, or a .

Weekly QuizzesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ ”
SOC10
“Took online course, weekly quizzes and short paragraph summaries of material that you discussed over the week.”
SOC10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you read the textbook you'll easily get an A in this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“They make tough topics easy to understand and keep the class interesting.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

100/100

“ !”

📈 Easy A Potential

92/100

“there should be no reason as to why you shouldn't get an A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are very insightful and informative but they do require participation.
  • He does a great job connecting it to real-life events so you can see how it applies to society.
  • The teacher is helpful and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • The work isn't hard, but showing up and participating is important.
  • Just read the textbook, and you will do amazing in this class.
  • Papers and .

Theme 3

🧭 About Structure

  • He provides the textbook,slides,everything 4 your success.
  • He posted weekly updates to make sure we knew what was due that week.
  • and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-two detailed reviews across online and highly, though some older reviews reduce recency slightly.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

SOC1018 reviews
SOC164 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 6 · A 11 · A- 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values