AI Rate Professor

Economics

Jake White

ECON1 · ECON97958 · ECON4 · ECON101 · ECON2 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself through a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy workloadPoor communicationTough gradingRude feedbackMixed older praise
  • Recent reviews are strongly negative, especially about communication, support, and .
  • Workload is repeatedly described as heavy, assignment-heavy, and time-consuming.
  • , but they are outweighed by newer complaints across both formats.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Some students earned high grades, but the , and possible zeroes for completed work.

Online reviews are especially harsh about workload and grading, while recent hard-class warnings.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The economics content may be understandable in isolated positive reviews, but the course experience is , and weak support.

Online students report unclear structure and heavy assignments, while and newer extreme difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

Reviews , but deadlines and late-work policies appear rigid.

Online reviews mention locked assignments and no late work, while attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most because they describe poor communication, rude responses, heavy work, and .

Online reviews are mostly negative, while but more recent warnings reduce confidence in recommending him.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Students describe point deductions despite , and unexplained zeroes.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize harsh or unexplained grading, while and newer tough-grader complaints.

Workload

Heavy

18/100

, and videos are repeatedly described as excessive or time-consuming.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy work, with online reviews focusing on assignment pressure and , and tests.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Recent students frequently describe poor communication, low effort, rude responses, and limited support despite a few older positive reviews.

Format shift

Online teaching is rated especially poorly, while but later reviews are much more negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

56/100

Assessment appears to combine , and presentations rather than one dominant method.

Format shift

Online reviews mention assignments, videos, tests, and projects, while in-person reviews , and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person evidence is split between older praise and newer complaints, but several reviews , and excessive work.

Main concern

Students face a high workload and inconsistent support, especially in more recent reviews.

What students said

“HARDEST CLASS IVE EVER TAKEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”
ECON101
“No support from this professor, does not communicate well”
ECON4

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students mostly describe heavy assignments, , and little flexibility.

Main concern

The main risk is feeling swamped by locked or .

What students said

“You have no choice but to feel swamped in his class”
ECON2
“At least 3 hours of .”
ECON4

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and quizzes, but they do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or closed-book policies.

Test HeavyQuizzesProjectsPractice Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and conceptual tests, but do not clearly prove exam security rules.

QuizzesExamsPractice TestsConceptual Tests
“presentation and ”
ECON101
“ and opportunity.”
ECON97958

Online

Online reviews mention tests and , but do not clearly prove exam format or .

Test Heavy
“He does assign a lot of assignments but they are generally easy”
ECON1
“Test heavy”
ECON1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if absolutely necessary.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“No support from this professor, does not communicate well and and clarification.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

25/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Pressure

18/100

“You have no choice but to feel swamped in his class”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • At least 3 hours of .
  • Every week there was a chapter to read, prerecorded lectures, vocab to define, and 2-3 discussion posts.
  • HARDEST CLASS IVE EVER TAKEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Theme 2

📩 About Communication

  • There was not a lot of communication from the professor.
  • Very rude when responding to emails.
  • comments.

Theme 3

⚖️

  • and clarification.
  • He may give you a 0 on an .
  • , and he gives practice tests and opportunity.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 12 reviews with detailed comments across both formats, though older positive reviews conflict with recent negative ones.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ECON44 reviews
ECON13 reviews
ECON1012 reviews
ECON22 reviews
ECON979581 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 2