AI Rate Professor

History

Luis Fernández

HIST17 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
83.33%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you can keep up with , and participation, especially online where the workload feels easier.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging lecturesReading and writing heavyParticipation mattersClear feedbackAttendance required in person
  • Students overwhelmingly praise his lectures, humor, and support.
  • Online reviews describe an easier routine with readings, simple assignments, and limited tests.
  • , and stricter about devices and formatting.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Getting an A looks realistic with , and basic effort, but writing rules and no late credit stop it from being effortless.

Online evidence is easier and more assignment-based, while , and writing pressure.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Students often call the class easy and engaging, though the reading and writing load can make it feel heavier.

Online reviews describe simple weekly work, while , and papers.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and participation are repeatedly described as required, while online reviews .

Attendance concerns come from in-person reviews; .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most students recommend him because lectures , and the course feels manageable when students keep up.

, but online reviews sound easier and because of writing and attendance.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

, but no late credit and MLA formatting strictness create real penalties.

Format shift

, while in-person students mention stricter formatting and no late credit.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The and writing depending on format and student expectations.

Format shift

Online workload is lighter and routine, while and reading-heavy.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students consistently describe him as engaging, funny, caring, and effective at making history interesting.

Format shift

Both formats support strong teaching, with in-person reviews especially praising lectures and discussion.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Assessment , and a few tests rather than relying only on exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention assignments and two big tests, while , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students praise the lectures but , and some writing-heavy expectations.

Main concern

, and writing expectations matter more in person.

What students said

“No devices! , so every class matters.”
HIST-17
“Theres about as much writing as an English class and we're not allowed to use electronics.”
HIST-17

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online students , and an easy path if they stay current.

Main concern

You still need to keep up with .

What students said

“as long as you do them the class is very easy”
HIST-17
“barley had any homework, the the textbook.”
HIST-17

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and tests but do not clearly prove .

QuizzesTwo Big TestsNo Multiple Choice Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and no multiple-choice quizzes, but do not clearly prove closed-book exams or strict proctoring.

QuizzesNo Multiple Choice Quizzes
“He doesn't believe in .”
HIST-17
“just your 3 quizzes.”
HIST-17

Online

Online reviews mention two big tests but do not clearly .

Two Big Tests
“only had 2 big test.”
HIST-17

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Fernandez does an amazing job teaching history and how it is impactful today!”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, format, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“Lectures are engaging.”

📚 Workload Reality

58/100

“Assigned readings every week (I'd spend about 4-5 hours on reading per week) but as long as you do them the class is very easy.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are engaging.
  • Professor Fernandez is an amazing professor who truly cares about his students.
  • He makes history very fun without it being hard.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Grades

  • there's no late credit.
  • as long as you do them the class is very easy.
  • !

Theme 3

🏫

  • No devices! , so every class matters.
  • Participation is required, don't miss class & be prepared to read lots & lots of articles

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve recent reviews across both formats show consistent praise with , and grading.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HIST-1712 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1