AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Hannah Lucas

PSYCH2517939 · PSYCH1 · PSYCH2518915 · PSYCH104129 · PSYCH20 · PSYCH25 · PYSCH1 · PSYCH80 · 34 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

She is a strong choice for students who want an engaging, caring professor and can keep up with and writing.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring teacherClear lecturesOpen-book examsWriting workloadResearch grading can be strict
  • Most students describe her as , and helpful.
  • Many courses are grade-friendly when students keep up, especially with and .
  • Research methods can feel stricter because and writing details matter more.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Most students say good grades are very reachable if you keep up with , and writing assignments.

Online evidence emphasizes steady weekly work for an A, while but .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

and , though research methods and writing-heavy sections can add challenge.

Online courses feel structured and manageable, while in-person difficulty varies more by course, especially PSYCH80.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Attendance helps because lectures, notes, participation, and in-class journals matter, but .

In-person reviews more often mention attending class and using notes, while online reviews rely on weekly participation and posted lectures.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and usually fair when students keep up.

, though online reviews mention more workload and in-person PSYCH80 reviews mention stricter grading.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Most reviews describe clear expectations, , but PSYCH80 has strict-grading complaints.

Format shift

Online grading is often described as clear and supportive, while .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Work is steady with , and papers, but many students say it is manageable if paced.

Format shift

Online reviews mention more weekly writing and reading, while research projects.

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Students repeatedly , and helpful across formats.

Format shift

Both formats show strong teaching evidence, with online students praising videos and structure and in-person students praising lectures and energy.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Assessment includes quizzes, journals, discussions, , and participation.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize journals, discussions, quizzes, and papers, while , and research assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews praise her energy, care, lectures, and in research classes.

Main concern

and expectations are exact.

What students said

“The so you really can't fail as long as you pay attention, study, and !”
PSYCH25
“ and assignments had to follow the professor's exact expectations.”
PSYCH80
“Lectures are very easy to understand, no tricks.”
PSYCH1

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are very positive overall, , and manageable grades despite steady work.

Main concern

The main issue is keeping up with , and papers.

What students said

“Everything is pretty easy as long as you follow the week by week schedule.”
PSYCH25
“She breaks down everything so all the research is done in parts”
PSYCH80
“If you do your work, you will pass with an A.”
PSYCH25

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

note-supported tests and clear preparation, though one research-methods review says exams did not match study guides well.

Open Book ExamsNotes AllowedEasy TestsStudy GuideQuizzes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews clearly mention open-book or , and one concern that study guides did not match exams.

Open Book ExamsNotes AllowedEasy QuizzesTough FinalStudy Guide
“The so you really can't fail as long as you pay attention, study, and !”
PSYCH25
“ if the tests.”
PSYCH25
“her study guides do not match the midterm and .”
PSYCH80

Online

, and , but do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, or final format.

Weekly QuizzesLecture Videos Help TestsExam Typos Mentioned
“Each week, we would go through 2 chapters and take 2 quizzes”
PSYCH25
“ .”
PSYCH80
“When I told her about typos in the on my end.”
PSYCH80

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Lucas is so funny, kind, and thoughtful ! Her lectures are very engaging and thought provoking”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“Her lectures are very engaging and thought provoking”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“ !”

⚖️

76/100

“As long as you keep up (which shouldn't be hard), you'll get an A.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are very easy to understand, no tricks.
  • Professor posts short informative lecture videos that provide all the information you need.
  • She genuinely was excited to teach and cared so much for her students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • The so you really can't fail as long as you pay attention, study, and !
  • As long as you keep up (which shouldn't be hard), you'll get an A.
  • and assignments had to follow the professor's exact expectations.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Lots and lots of work to do in this class but she gives you a .
  • Wrote journals each week about 5 pages.
  • A and journal.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

34

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-five detailed reviews across online and in-person formats show consistent praise with a .

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 524
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PSYCH8015 reviews
PSYCH2513 reviews
PSYCH12 reviews
Psych-201 review
PSYCH1041291 review
Show 3 more courses
PSYCH25179391 review
PSYCH25189151 review
PYSCH11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 6 · A 8 · A- 2

B range

12

B+ 2 · B 10

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 4