AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mohammad Wardak

STAT10 · MATH450 · MATH425 · MATH65A · STAT00760 · MATH25 · MATH85 · MATH65B · STATS10 · MATH31 · MATH401 · MATH75 · 189 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
64.71%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you can keep up with homework and study guides, but expect a math class that rewards steady practice more than engaging lectures.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear test alignmentCaring and approachableHomework heavyMonotone lecturesPractice exams help
  • Many students , and study guides, making success predictable with practice.
  • Workload is steady and often Pearson-heavy, so .
  • Teaching style is polarizing because some students like the example-based structure while others find him monotone, fast, or unclear.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

An A is realistic if , and practice exams, but it is not effortless.

Online success depends more on self-management through Pearson or MyMathLab, while and practice exams.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The math content is real and sometimes fast-paced, but and example-based lectures make it manageable.

Online courses can feel more self-taught, while in-person sections usually provide , and tests.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Several students say attendance is required or that skipping class hurts because in-class work and participation affect grades.

, while online evidence is less direct but still emphasizes keeping up with lectures and work.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

because and he cares, though his lecture style does not work for everyone.

In-person recommendations are stronger and more detailed, while online reviews are more mixed because of self-teaching and communication issues.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

65/100

Students often describe fair or , and exams matching study materials.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide the strongest evidence of fair grading, while and harsh or .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, but students usually describe it as reasonable if done consistently.

Format shift

Online workload is more platform-driven, while , and attendance work.

Teaching experience

Good

73/100

He is often described as caring and , but many students find his lectures monotone, fast, or not deeply explanatory.

Format shift

In-person reviews show more consistent praise for care and test alignment, while online and self-teaching concerns.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

76/100

, and finals, with many students saying exams are central and closely tied to study guides.

Format shift

Online reviews mention MyMathLab homework, quizzes, and exams, while in-person , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive when students , and attend class, but lectures can be boring or fast.

Main concern

, and because grades often depend on few major items.

What students said

“ .”
MATH65B
“Put in the work and you will leave with an A.”
MATH85
“This professor has a low and monotone voice.”
MATH31

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online and study guides but warning about Pearson-heavy work and occasional disorganization.

Main concern

Online students may need to self-manage Pearson work and .

What students said

“If taking his online class, I highly recommend his !”
STAT10
“the entire course is .”
MATH75
“You are going to be on your own with learning”
STAT10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are usually student-friendly because align closely with the real tests.

Practice exams match real examsStudy guides providedNote card allowedLowest quiz droppedFew surprises

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews strongly support predictable exams with practice tests, study guides, and note cards in several sections.

Practice exams near identicalStudy guides providedIndex card allowedFinal note sheet allowed
“ .”
MATH65B
“For quizzes and sides).”
MATH65B
“He provides practice exams that are almost exactly like the real exams.”
MATH65B

Online

, and notes allowed, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

MyMathLab examsStudy guides providedNotes allowed in one reviewNo clear proctoring evidence
“the entire course is .”
MATH75
“Quizzes and . He lets you use notes.”
MATH401

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Put in the work and you will leave with an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, , and grade predictability. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

73/100

“Amazing professor! His lectures are clear & easy to follow, mostly focused on examples, which made the material easy to understand.”

📘

78/100

“ .”

📈 Effort For Grade

72/100

“Study those and do the homework as the class goes on and you will be good!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Chill professor, his lectures are long and can be boring since he just goes over examples.
  • He is happy to answer questions.
  • Very fast and does not really teach.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Put in the work and you will leave with an A.
  • If you know how to do these questions, you'll do well on the tests.
  • it can be difficult to bounce .

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • What he taught in his lectures was very similar to what and .
  • He gives out a .
  • For quizzes and sides).

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

189

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is highly credible because 50 reviews across formats and years provide detailed, , and teaching style.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 588
4 out of 527
3 out of 518
2 out of 532
1 out of 525

Course coverage

MATH65B16 reviews
STAT107 reviews
MATH4014 reviews
MATH4504 reviews
MATH65A4 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH313 reviews
MATH853 reviews
MATH252 reviews
MATH4252 reviews
MATH752 reviews
STATS102 reviews
STAT007601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

23

A+ 5 · A 15 · A- 3

B range

10

B+ 4 · B 6

C range

5

C+ 1 · C 4

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 4